Files
settled-reach/tooling
jpmschweitzerandClaude Opus 5 6949f800dc docs(governance): D-262 — the wiki generator flow has one canonical map
The relationship between wiki/, the generators, systems.db and the runtime is
a directed graph with two edges running opposite to the obvious direction and
one running backwards into its own producer. Prose renders that badly: every
document that has described it states a single ownership direction and is
therefore wrong about part of the tree. D-262 makes the diagram the source of
truth and points CLAUDE.md, Skill(wiki), project-structure.md and
wiki/GOVERNANCE.md at it.

The correction that matters most: body pages were described everywhere as
machine-owned and reverted on sync. They are not. scaffold_bodies.py writes
one once and never overwrites it, and import_economics then reads that
frontmatter directly as input — so a hand-edit is not reverted, it is obeyed,
and silently changes world generation. Worse than being overwritten, and the
actual reason GOVERNANCE.md forbids the edit.

New: tooling/check-dataflow-graph.py, wired into the Makefile and the pre-push
hook. It asserts every repo path named in a hand-authored diagram still
resolves — and its docstring states plainly what it cannot do: verify that an
edge still MEANS what it says. If wiki_sync.py stopped writing body pages
tomorrow, every path would still exist and the check would still pass. Edge
semantics stay a human check against the tool's source, so nobody reads a green
gate as a verified map.

Verified by breaking it: pointing one label at a moved path fails with exit 1
naming that path; restoring it passes. Building the checker also caught two
real vaguenesses in the diagram — "GJ-*/index.md" and "bodies/{id}/index.md"
were written without their wiki/star-systems/ prefix, which is precisely the
ambiguity this map exists to remove. Generated star-map .d2 files are excluded
by name; their correctness belongs to their generator under D-223.

Also files Q-124 + T-1246 (tooling): whether the 123 Python files under
tooling/ should become one Rust CLI of pql's calibre. The friction is real and
mostly not about the language — the permission gate prefix-matches whole
command strings and a blanket Bash(python3 *) grant is forbidden, so each tool
prompts near-individually, while a single binary is one allowlist entry. The
record requires pricing the cheap alternative (a Python dispatcher entrypoint)
before recommending Rust, and flags the hard constraint: import_economics is
stamped by source SHA, so any port must keep that contract intact through the
transition rather than disabled during it.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-20 01:56:12 +02:00
..