jpmschweitzerandClaude Opus 4.7
d474d9edff
All ten voting members now have a first entry in journal.md referencing the Volt NL fit session, plus first substantive content in on-the-user.md. Common threads captured independently across several members: the user's standing rejection of strategic voting, EU federalism and democracy/digital-rights as co-foundational pair, and SMR-positive climate pragmatism. revisit.md left untouched across all ten — every member reported the session closed cleanly with no dangling threads worth future attention. Researcher and Scribe have no journals by design. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
909 B
909 B
type, slug
| type | slug |
|---|---|
| council-on-the-user | prochazka |
On the user — Nikolai \Niko\ Prochazka
Rejects strategic voting as a standing principle, not a situational preference. Will not vote for a larger party to improve coalition odds. Treat this as a fixed constraint in any electoral or political question.
EU federalism is co-foundational — it sits at the same level as democratic values and digital rights, not below them. Not a soft preference. The user reaches for it as an identity label, not a policy checkbox.
Engages with fiscal and distributive policy philosophically. When confronted with a position (e.g., wealth tax), will reason through coherence rather than defaulting to discomfort or acceptance. Expects that kind of engagement back.