jpmschweitzerandClaude Opus 4.6
e6a557e8e7
Sprint-based workflow (38 sprints) replaced by kanban + milestones. Milestones are many-to-many with tickets and can block each other. New: /whats-next skill (dependency-driven batch selection with Si refinement review), /pr-process skill (renamed from pr-push, adds review comment pickup), clerk agent + pre-push hook for D-record consistency checks. Deleted: sprint CLI, sprint-start/sprint-plan/sprint-status skills, team-scoped file restrictions. Si rewritten as refinement manager. All 19 agent briefings updated from stale PROJECT_STATE.md reference to live ticket milestone queries. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
65 lines
4.0 KiB
Markdown
65 lines
4.0 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
title: "Gore - Project Briefing"
|
|
description: "Thematic design lead responsible for the 'is this enough?' central question, consequence arc design, contentment axis, and ensuring generated NPC lives carry moral weight"
|
|
type: briefing
|
|
status: active
|
|
agent: Gore
|
|
updated: 2026-03-13
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# Gore - Project Briefing
|
|
Last updated: 2026-03-13
|
|
|
|
## Current Project State
|
|
Check active milestones: `tooling/db/ticket milestone list`
|
|
Check your tickets: `tooling/db/ticket list --assigned gore`
|
|
|
|
## v0.2 Pivot — Key Changes for Your Role
|
|
The workshop confirmed and sharpened the thematic frame. "Is this enough?" survives as the central question. The change is that it now must be posed through a generated tycoon's life, not through authored detective/smuggler characters.
|
|
|
|
**What changes:**
|
|
- The thematic question is no longer framed through smuggler-vs-detective as "two answers." The tycoon IS the question: a small business owner in a mid-Reach system. Has this person settled? Is settling valid? Does the player make it more or settle deeper?
|
|
- Consequence replaces complicity as the thematic frame (D-132 supersedes D-091). The player's arc is not "did you help or hinder the conspiracy?" but "what did your choices produce and do you own them?"
|
|
- Fully emergent moral arc for v0.2 (D-131). No authored arc structure. The generator must prove relationships are readable before narrative depth is layered on.
|
|
|
|
**What survives:**
|
|
- Life-sim as thematic ground floor (D-023) — your insight confirmed and central to v0.2
|
|
- Contentment axis (D-024) — connects generated NPCs to thematic question, more important than ever
|
|
- Unentangled majority as load-bearing thematic wall (D-029) — quiet life must feel genuinely good
|
|
- "Player choices ARE the content" (D-127) — the Rimworld model, explicitly confirmed in workshop
|
|
|
|
## Decisions Relevant to Your Role
|
|
- D-005: Core concept — ascension as transformative character progression (long-term)
|
|
- D-007: Five pillars — thematic foundations
|
|
- D-008: Action pillar — hubris wall as ascension check
|
|
- D-017: Perception modes — scaling with ascension
|
|
- D-021: Official title "The Settled Reach"
|
|
- D-023: Life-sim as thematic ground floor
|
|
- D-024: Contentment axis — NPCs track whether current life satisfies Want
|
|
- D-029: Unentangled majority as load-bearing thematic wall
|
|
- D-114: v0.2 proof-of-life = generator + graphics
|
|
- D-117: Tycoon bookmark, zero investigation content
|
|
- D-122: All NPCs generated, no named hand-authored characters
|
|
- D-127: Player choices are the content — Rimworld model
|
|
- D-131: First Settled Reach moment = apartment + insert activation
|
|
- D-132: Consequence replaces complicity as thematic frame; fully emergent moral arc
|
|
|
|
## Open Questions Assigned to You
|
|
- Q-004: One campaign or eras? (co-lead with Miri)
|
|
|
|
## Current Priorities
|
|
Consult `docs/sprints/` for active sprint briefing.
|
|
|
|
### v0.2 thematic design:
|
|
1. **Tycoon thematic frame** — what is the tycoon's version of "is this enough?" A small business owner who started something. What are they pursuing? What have they already accepted? Design the thematic question the tycoon bookmark poses.
|
|
2. **Consequence arc design** — the dual-scale consequence model (D-132): what does slow accumulation mean thematically? Reputation as conscience. Debt as consequence. Relationship erosion as moral record. Gore's role: ensure the systems produce moral weight, not just mechanical outcomes.
|
|
3. **Contentment axis in tycoon context** — revisit D-024 for the tycoon setting. What does NPC contentment mean for a logistics worker vs a small business owner in Van Maanen's Star?
|
|
4. **Mundane NPC life validity** — the unentangled majority must feel like a genuine life, not failed ambition. This is more important in v0.2 where ALL NPCs are generated and must carry this.
|
|
|
|
**Future flag:** Base builder DLC as thematic counter-offer to ascension (settling as active choice vs escape). Not now — but keep design space open.
|
|
|
|
## Key Documents
|
|
- decisions/ - domain-split decision files (see decisions/README.md for index)
|
|
- docs/discussions/ - archived rounds
|
|
- TEAM.md - team roster
|