jpmschweitzerandClaude Opus 4.6
9d2ab53302
Standardized YAML frontmatter on 7 files across docs/test-plans/, docs/test-reports/, and docs/audits/. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
65 lines
2.3 KiB
Markdown
65 lines
2.3 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
title: "Architecture Audits"
|
|
description: "Index and methodology reference for adversarial two-round architecture audits. Documents the review format, scope, reviewer roles, and audit history."
|
|
type: audit
|
|
status: active
|
|
created: 2026-02-11
|
|
updated: 2026-02-11
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# Architecture Audits
|
|
|
|
## Audit Pattern: Adversarial Two-Round Review with Code Review
|
|
|
|
### Format
|
|
|
|
Two independent reviewers (typically Tyre + Troblum) run a structured architecture audit in two rounds:
|
|
|
|
**Round 1 — Independent Reviews (parallel)**
|
|
- Each reviewer independently analyzes the architecture plan AND current code
|
|
- Covers decisions, implementation, risks, scalability, and recommendations
|
|
- Reviewers do not see each other's output
|
|
|
|
**Round 2 — Adversarial Debate (parallel)**
|
|
- Each reviewer receives the other's Round 1 findings
|
|
- Writes a debate response: AGREE / PUSH BACK / SYNTHESIZE per finding
|
|
- Challenges assumptions, catches blind spots, reconciles priorities
|
|
|
|
**Synthesis — Consensus Recommendations**
|
|
- Merged priority list both reviewers sign off on
|
|
- Items rated by sprint and effort
|
|
- "Not Accepted" section for recommendations that were debated and deferred
|
|
|
|
### Scope
|
|
|
|
Each review covers:
|
|
- Architecture decisions (all `decisions/*.md` domain files)
|
|
- Current implementation (server Rust code, client GDScript code, tests)
|
|
- Technical risk assessment with severity ratings
|
|
- Decision coherence and gaps
|
|
- Scalability and performance analysis
|
|
- Implementation readiness
|
|
- Prioritized recommendations
|
|
|
|
### Output
|
|
|
|
Single document per audit, date-coded: `architecture-review-YYYY-MM-DD.md`
|
|
|
|
### Reviewers
|
|
|
|
- **Tyre** (Technical Architect, internal) — focuses on decision coherence, system design, implementation readiness, algorithm selection
|
|
- **Troblum** (External Technical Consultant) — focuses on technology evaluation, operational concerns, failure modes, performance profiling, time bombs
|
|
|
|
### When to Run
|
|
|
|
- Before major sprint milestones
|
|
- After significant architecture decisions
|
|
- When scope changes require re-evaluation
|
|
- At kill switch checkpoints (D-020)
|
|
|
|
## Audit History
|
|
|
|
| Date | Reviewers | Scope | Key Finding |
|
|
|------|-----------|-------|-------------|
|
|
| 2026-02-11 | Tyre + Troblum | Full architecture + code (Sprint 1) | Architecture GREEN, implementation plan AMBER — knowledge graph and observer pipeline underspecified |
|