fix(copy): correct Freiholt system ID in Compact faction page
GJ 624 is Halvøy (aquaculture world), not Freiholt. Freiholt is GJ 453. Fixed both cross-reference occurrences in compact-of-westphalia.md. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ What the Compact has built, over sixty to eighty years of careful, incremental w
|
||||
|
||||
The west_reach corridor has been developing its autonomist character since the first wave of settlement pushed past hop 6. The corridor's Germanic and Scandinavian founding communities carried a cultural orientation toward local governance and institutional self-sufficiency that intensified with distance from the Gateway. By the time wave_3 settlements were being established at hops 7 and 8, the practical reality was that most outer west_reach systems governed themselves without meaningful Assembly oversight — not because they had rejected the Assembly, but because the Assembly's authority attenuated with distance until it became theoretical.
|
||||
|
||||
The Compact formalized what was already true. Approximately sixty to eighty years ago, representatives from a group of outer west_reach systems — including founding members [Ostmark](../star-systems/GJ-601A/index.md) (GJ 601A), [Freiholt](../star-systems/GJ-624/index.md) (GJ 624), and several other wave_1 through wave_3 systems with centuries of self-governance history — drafted the mutual recognition framework. The document was not a declaration of independence. It was an agreement among neighbors: we recognize each other's governance as legitimate, we coordinate our commercial arrangements, and we do not accept that a distant Assembly has authority over our internal affairs.
|
||||
The Compact formalized what was already true. Approximately sixty to eighty years ago, representatives from a group of outer west_reach systems — including founding members [Ostmark](../star-systems/GJ-601A/index.md) (GJ 601A), [Freiholt](../star-systems/GJ-453/index.md) (GJ 453), and several other wave_1 through wave_3 systems with centuries of self-governance history — drafted the mutual recognition framework. The document was not a declaration of independence. It was an agreement among neighbors: we recognize each other's governance as legitimate, we coordinate our commercial arrangements, and we do not accept that a distant Assembly has authority over our internal affairs.
|
||||
|
||||
The drafting process was deliberate and unhurried. The founding systems had been governing themselves for centuries. They were not in crisis. They were formalizing an arrangement that the Assembly's absence had already created, and they did so with the institutional patience of communities that measure decisions in generations rather than political cycles.
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -130,7 +130,7 @@ The internal tension — treaty versus government, founding members versus new m
|
||||
|
||||
**Cross-References:**
|
||||
- [Ostmark](../star-systems/GJ-601A/index.md) (GJ 601A) — Founding member; institutional anchor; wave_1 at hop 9
|
||||
- [Freiholt](../star-systems/GJ-624/index.md) (GJ 624) — Founding member
|
||||
- [Freiholt](../star-systems/GJ-453/index.md) (GJ 453) — Founding member
|
||||
- [Altmark](../star-systems/GJ-357/index.md) (GJ 357) — Assembly trade delegate; diplomatic outpost at Compact's edge
|
||||
- [Groenland](../star-systems/GJ-3333/index.md) (GJ 3333) — Pragmatic member; joined for trade economics
|
||||
- [Echternach](../star-systems/GJ-127B/index.md) (GJ 127B) — Deep-corridor member; medical supply dependency
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user