mirror of
https://github.com/pewdiepie-archdaemon/odysseus.git
synced 2026-09-11 10:42:22 +02:00
RaresKeYandStressTestor
7026cf40b5
* docs(specs): restore bootstrap after dev rewrite
* docs(specs): remove runtime inventory snapshot
* docs(specs): reconcile current dev truth
* docs(specs): document scheduled task actions as an owner-attribution source
Owner Attribution covered cookie, bearer-token and internal-loopback
requests. Scheduled task actions are a fourth source and behave
differently: _execute_action passes owner=task.owner off the stored
ScheduledTask row, so no request and no resolved principal are in
flight, and route-level require_user() never runs.
Webhook triggers are the sharp case. They are unauthenticated by
design with the token as the only credential and execute under the
stored task.owner.
Paths cite routes/task/task_routes.py, the canonical location after
the task subpackage move (#6081); routes/task_routes.py on current dev
is the backward-compat shim.
* docs(specs): add chained tasks to the trigger list, refresh dev stamp
Review feedback from RaresKeY on the previous commit.
"Every trigger path" was too broad: success-chained tasks are another
path into _execute_action. Added them with their own citation, and
noted that chaining additionally requires the target task to share
task.owner and rejects cycles, which is stricter than the trigger-side
checks. Softened the lead-in to "these trigger paths".
Line 56 still pointed at routes/task_routes.py for webhook credential
validation. That path is the backward-compat shim on current dev after
the task subpackage move (#6081); repointed to the canonical
routes/task/task_routes.py.
Stamp moved to dev@2a6b09b. Inspection backing that bump was scoped:
every file path cited in this spec was mechanically checked to resolve
on 2a6b09b, and every file:line in the Owner Attribution additions was
read against it. Behavioral claims elsewhere in the file were not
re-audited.
* docs(specs): correct SECURE_COOKIES description to match current behavior
Third of the stale details RaresKeY enumerated. The cookie section
described SECURE_COOKIES as purely opt-in, which stopped being true.
_secure_cookie() (routes/auth_routes.py:89) treats an explicit true or
false as authoritative and derives the Secure attribute from the
request otherwise, including when the variable is unset and when
docker-compose injects it present-but-empty. Either the connection
scheme or the first X-Forwarded-Proto hop being https is enough.
* docs(specs): refresh current dev truth
---------
Co-authored-by: StressTestor <212606152+StressTestor@users.noreply.github.com>
22 lines
886 B
Markdown
22 lines
886 B
Markdown
# OpenCode Provider Shape
|
|
|
|
Last updated: dev@2e2bb52 | 2026-08-16
|
|
|
|
## Scope
|
|
|
|
Canonical provider identity `opencode` with Zen/Go endpoint variants; OpenAI-compatible transport and webhook presets in `src/llm_core.py` and canonical `routes/webhook/webhook_routes.py`, with the top-level route module retained as a compatibility shim.
|
|
|
|
## Shape
|
|
|
|
Keep Zen and Go path identity in endpoint metadata even though the canonical
|
|
provider family is OpenCode. Model discovery uses general identity-only
|
|
fallback. Path/version, account policy, and model selection can differ between
|
|
variants; do not flatten them into OpenAI.
|
|
|
|
## Fallback And Current Gaps
|
|
|
|
Exact `*.opencode.ai` plus configured `/zen` or `/zen/go` selects this family.
|
|
No provider-specific rich capability catalog is mapped, and runtime still has
|
|
separate variant labels that should eventually become structured endpoint
|
|
metadata.
|