Files
RaresKeYandStressTestor 7026cf40b5 docs: bootstrap specs ground truth (#5794)
* docs(specs): restore bootstrap after dev rewrite

* docs(specs): remove runtime inventory snapshot

* docs(specs): reconcile current dev truth

* docs(specs): document scheduled task actions as an owner-attribution source

Owner Attribution covered cookie, bearer-token and internal-loopback
requests. Scheduled task actions are a fourth source and behave
differently: _execute_action passes owner=task.owner off the stored
ScheduledTask row, so no request and no resolved principal are in
flight, and route-level require_user() never runs.

Webhook triggers are the sharp case. They are unauthenticated by
design with the token as the only credential and execute under the
stored task.owner.

Paths cite routes/task/task_routes.py, the canonical location after
the task subpackage move (#6081); routes/task_routes.py on current dev
is the backward-compat shim.

* docs(specs): add chained tasks to the trigger list, refresh dev stamp

Review feedback from RaresKeY on the previous commit.

"Every trigger path" was too broad: success-chained tasks are another
path into _execute_action. Added them with their own citation, and
noted that chaining additionally requires the target task to share
task.owner and rejects cycles, which is stricter than the trigger-side
checks. Softened the lead-in to "these trigger paths".

Line 56 still pointed at routes/task_routes.py for webhook credential
validation. That path is the backward-compat shim on current dev after
the task subpackage move (#6081); repointed to the canonical
routes/task/task_routes.py.

Stamp moved to dev@2a6b09b. Inspection backing that bump was scoped:
every file path cited in this spec was mechanically checked to resolve
on 2a6b09b, and every file:line in the Owner Attribution additions was
read against it. Behavioral claims elsewhere in the file were not
re-audited.

* docs(specs): correct SECURE_COOKIES description to match current behavior

Third of the stale details RaresKeY enumerated. The cookie section
described SECURE_COOKIES as purely opt-in, which stopped being true.

_secure_cookie() (routes/auth_routes.py:89) treats an explicit true or
false as authoritative and derives the Secure attribute from the
request otherwise, including when the variable is unset and when
docker-compose injects it present-but-empty. Either the connection
scheme or the first X-Forwarded-Proto hop being https is enough.

* docs(specs): refresh current dev truth

---------

Co-authored-by: StressTestor <212606152+StressTestor@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-08-25 14:18:44 +02:00

57 lines
2.3 KiB
Markdown

# Cohere Provider Shape
Last updated: dev@e57f60b | 2026-07-20
## Scope
Documented provider identity `cohere`; native Chat v2 plus the OpenAI
Compatibility API. Current `dev` has no dedicated Cohere capability reader or
direct Cohere request adapter; compatible endpoints use the general runtime
path when explicitly configured.
## Catalog Shape
`GET /v1/models` returns a paginated `models[]` envelope. Each model can carry
`name`, `endpoints`, `default_endpoints`, `context_length`, `features`, and
`sampling_defaults`; the root can carry `next_page_token`.
These are candidate fields for a future dedicated reader:
- a single canonical family from `endpoints`: `chat`/`generate`, `embed`,
`rerank`, or `classify`;
- `context_length` to the endpoint/model context limit;
- known sampling-default keys to deterministic controls.
Current canonical normalization does not map them. When the generic reader is
explicitly selected with vendor `cohere`, it preserves only item identity plus
the raw item; family, context, features, and sampling controls stay unknown.
## Request And Response Shape
Native `POST /v2/chat` uses `messages`, structured content blocks, tools,
`response_format`, sampling fields, and an optional structured `thinking`
object. Text lives in `message.content[type=text].text`; reasoning-capable
models use `message.content[type=thinking].thinking`. Streaming uses typed
events rather than one generic text delta.
The OpenAI compatibility base is `/compatibility/v1`. Its current chat subset
includes tools, structured output, sampling, and `reasoning_effort`, but model
support remains per-model. In the compatibility dialect only `none` and `high`
currently map to native thinking off/on; do not assume low/medium support.
## Fallback And Safety
No Cohere host or payload-shape detection exists in the canonical reader
registry. The caller must supply provider/endpoint configuration. Marketing
pages and provider-wide endpoint features do not grant every listed model
tools, vision, or reasoning.
## Evidence And Gaps
- Official List/Get Models resources define the catalog fields.
- Official Chat v2, Reasoning, and Compatibility API resources define the
transport and thinking controls.
- Odysseus has no direct Cohere request adapter, canonical reader, or sanitized
canonical fixtures yet; both normalization and runtime integration remain
follow-up work.