* docs(specs): restore bootstrap after dev rewrite
* docs(specs): remove runtime inventory snapshot
* docs(specs): reconcile current dev truth
* docs(specs): document scheduled task actions as an owner-attribution source
Owner Attribution covered cookie, bearer-token and internal-loopback
requests. Scheduled task actions are a fourth source and behave
differently: _execute_action passes owner=task.owner off the stored
ScheduledTask row, so no request and no resolved principal are in
flight, and route-level require_user() never runs.
Webhook triggers are the sharp case. They are unauthenticated by
design with the token as the only credential and execute under the
stored task.owner.
Paths cite routes/task/task_routes.py, the canonical location after
the task subpackage move (#6081); routes/task_routes.py on current dev
is the backward-compat shim.
* docs(specs): add chained tasks to the trigger list, refresh dev stamp
Review feedback from RaresKeY on the previous commit.
"Every trigger path" was too broad: success-chained tasks are another
path into _execute_action. Added them with their own citation, and
noted that chaining additionally requires the target task to share
task.owner and rejects cycles, which is stricter than the trigger-side
checks. Softened the lead-in to "these trigger paths".
Line 56 still pointed at routes/task_routes.py for webhook credential
validation. That path is the backward-compat shim on current dev after
the task subpackage move (#6081); repointed to the canonical
routes/task/task_routes.py.
Stamp moved to dev@2a6b09b. Inspection backing that bump was scoped:
every file path cited in this spec was mechanically checked to resolve
on 2a6b09b, and every file:line in the Owner Attribution additions was
read against it. Behavioral claims elsewhere in the file were not
re-audited.
* docs(specs): correct SECURE_COOKIES description to match current behavior
Third of the stale details RaresKeY enumerated. The cookie section
described SECURE_COOKIES as purely opt-in, which stopped being true.
_secure_cookie() (routes/auth_routes.py:89) treats an explicit true or
false as authoritative and derives the Secure attribute from the
request otherwise, including when the variable is unset and when
docker-compose injects it present-but-empty. Either the connection
scheme or the first X-Forwarded-Proto hop being https is enough.
* docs(specs): refresh current dev truth
---------
Co-authored-by: StressTestor <212606152+StressTestor@users.noreply.github.com>
Keep dev version metadata aligned with the current hotfix release while the rolling branch continues toward 1.1.0.
Evidence: the canonical APP_VERSION imports as 1.0.3 and the diff check is clean. This commit changes version metadata only; it does not tag or publish a release.
scripts/mlx_image_server.py resolved the model per request
(`req.model or _args.model`) on both /v1/images/generations and
/v1/images/edits, so the caller chose which model was served.
`_is_hidream()` is a substring test and `_snapshot_path()` accepts either a
local directory or a Hugging Face repo id, so a caller-supplied string
selected the HiDream branch and then supplied the directory it runs
`scripts/hidream_o1/generate_hidream_o1_mlx.py` from, under sys.executable.
The server has no auth, and the Cookbook binds it to 0.0.0.0 whenever it is
serving to a remote host, so one POST executed attacker code on the serving
host.
Both paths now use `_args.model`. The request field is still accepted for
OpenAI wire compatibility and ignored, matching scripts/diffusion_server.py,
and Odysseus already sends the served model's own id, so this is a no-op for
legitimate callers. /v1/images/harmonize already pinned.
Regression tests cover both endpoints, the local-directory and
Hugging-Face-repo halves, and that a server actually launched with a HiDream
model still serves it. Three of the four fail on the unfixed code.
The approved-action replay appends the sealed tool result with no assistant
prose for that round, which produced an assistant message with content "".
Anthropic's Messages API rejects a non-final assistant message with empty
content, so a resumed turn after a tool approval failed before the model saw
the result. A turn carrying neither prose nor reasoning has nothing to say to
any provider, so it is no longer appended. A round with prose, and a
reasoning-only round that DeepSeek thinking mode needs, both still append.