The Dependencies tab's llama.cpp docker recipe surfaced
\`docker pull ghcr.io/ggerganov/llama.cpp:server-cuda\`. The upstream
repo moved from github.com/ggerganov/llama.cpp to
github.com/ggml-org/llama.cpp and the old GHCR namespace no longer
publishes images, so copying the recipe failed with:
failed to resolve reference "ghcr.io/ggerganov/llama.cpp:server-cuda":
not found
Point the recipe at \`ghcr.io/ggml-org/llama.cpp:server-cuda\`, which is
already the namespace routes/cookbook_routes.py uses for the source
clone. Adds a regression test in the same shape as
test_cookbook_diagnosis_js.py asserting the new namespace and forbidding
the dead one.
No CSS/HTML/SVG/style changes — the file is a pure data module
(no DOM access) consumed by other renderers; only the displayed command
text changes.
Two background tasks scheduled on every chat completion in
routes/chat_helpers.py — the memory/skill extraction dispatch and the
session auto-namer — are created via bare asyncio.create_task(...).
asyncio only holds a weak reference to the outer task, so the GC can
collect it mid-execution and the work silently never runs.
Add a module-private _BG_TASKS set and a _spawn_bg() helper that mirrors
WebhookManager._spawn_tracked (the pattern #3964 / #4336 established for
the webhook emitters two lines apart in the same function). Route both
call sites through it so the lifecycle owner is explicit.
Adds an AST-level guard test that fails on any bare
asyncio.create_task(...) statement in routes/chat_helpers.py to prevent
a regression — same shape as test_webhook_emitters_use_manager.py from
#4336.
The same bare pattern exists in routes/email_routes.py and
routes/cookbook_routes.py; left out of this PR per CONTRIBUTING.md's
"one fix per PR" and tracked in #4443's "Additional Information" for a
follow-up.
The three public webhook emitters in chat_helpers and webhook_routes
schedule deliveries via asyncio.create_task(webhook_manager.fire(...)),
which bypasses WebhookManager._bg_tasks. asyncio only holds a weak
reference to the outer task, so the GC can collect it mid-delivery and
the webhook is silently dropped.
Route all three through webhook_manager.fire_and_forget() so the task
is tracked by _spawn_tracked() and the manager owns the full lifecycle.
Adds an AST-level guard test that scans routes/ for direct
asyncio.create_task wrapping webhook_manager.fire(...) to prevent
regressions.
Wei Hong