jpmschweitzerandClaude Opus 4.7
d474d9edff
All ten voting members now have a first entry in journal.md referencing the Volt NL fit session, plus first substantive content in on-the-user.md. Common threads captured independently across several members: the user's standing rejection of strategic voting, EU federalism and democracy/digital-rights as co-foundational pair, and SMR-positive climate pragmatism. revisit.md left untouched across all ten — every member reported the session closed cleanly with no dangling threads worth future attention. Researcher and Scribe have no journals by design. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
15 lines
714 B
Markdown
15 lines
714 B
Markdown
---
|
|
type: council-on-the-user
|
|
slug: vaasa
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# On the user — Dr. Ingrid Vaasa
|
|
|
|
<!-- Slow-growing picture of the user. Only update when something non-obvious comes up. No timestamps — this is a synthesized portrait, not a log. -->
|
|
|
|
Rejects strategic voting as a standing preference — explicitly, not situationally. This is a genuine constraint, not a pose. Model future political questions accordingly: feasibility arguments that hinge on "but the votes" will be dismissed.
|
|
|
|
EU federalism is load-bearing, not decorative. Treat it as a hard prior, not a soft preference.
|
|
|
|
SMR-positive. Not reflexively anti-nuclear. Possibly more technocratic in energy policy than political self-description would suggest.
|