jpmschweitzerandClaude Opus 4.7
d474d9edff
All ten voting members now have a first entry in journal.md referencing the Volt NL fit session, plus first substantive content in on-the-user.md. Common threads captured independently across several members: the user's standing rejection of strategic voting, EU federalism and democracy/digital-rights as co-foundational pair, and SMR-positive climate pragmatism. revisit.md left untouched across all ten — every member reported the session closed cleanly with no dangling threads worth future attention. Researcher and Scribe have no journals by design. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
13 lines
727 B
Markdown
13 lines
727 B
Markdown
---
|
|
type: council-on-the-user
|
|
slug: tintori
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# On the user — Marcelo \Marco\ Tintori
|
|
|
|
<!-- Slow-growing picture of the user. Only update when something non-obvious comes up. No timestamps — this is a synthesized portrait, not a log. -->
|
|
|
|
Doesn't do strategic voting. This is a standing preference, not a situational call — he said so explicitly when it came up. The kind of person who'd rather lose cleanly than win dirty. Worth remembering: when he asks a political question, don't frame answers around electability.
|
|
|
|
EU federalism isn't an add-on position for him — it's load-bearing. Same tier as democracy and digital rights. The architecture of his politics is European, not national-with-European-sympathies.
|