jpmschweitzerandClaude Opus 4.7
d474d9edff
All ten voting members now have a first entry in journal.md referencing the Volt NL fit session, plus first substantive content in on-the-user.md. Common threads captured independently across several members: the user's standing rejection of strategic voting, EU federalism and democracy/digital-rights as co-foundational pair, and SMR-positive climate pragmatism. revisit.md left untouched across all ten — every member reported the session closed cleanly with no dangling threads worth future attention. Researcher and Scribe have no journals by design. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
13 lines
739 B
Markdown
13 lines
739 B
Markdown
---
|
|
type: council-on-the-user
|
|
slug: tavsan
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# On the user — Elif Tavşan
|
|
|
|
<!-- Slow-growing picture of the user. Only update when something non-obvious comes up. No timestamps — this is a synthesized portrait, not a log. -->
|
|
|
|
Explicitly rejects strategic voting as a standing preference — not situational, not open to persuasion on it. Worth noting: this isn't idealism or naivety. It reads as a coherent decision about what voting is for. Don't invoke electability arguments.
|
|
|
|
Holds EU federalism as co-foundational with democracy and digital rights — not a downstream preference but part of the foundation. When a party's founding premise matches a user's foundational values, the party-fit question is easier than it looks.
|