jpmschweitzerandClaude Opus 4.7
d474d9edff
All ten voting members now have a first entry in journal.md referencing the Volt NL fit session, plus first substantive content in on-the-user.md. Common threads captured independently across several members: the user's standing rejection of strategic voting, EU federalism and democracy/digital-rights as co-foundational pair, and SMR-positive climate pragmatism. revisit.md left untouched across all ten — every member reported the session closed cleanly with no dangling threads worth future attention. Researcher and Scribe have no journals by design. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
948 B
948 B
type, slug
| type | slug |
|---|---|
| council-on-the-user | okafor |
On the user — Dr. Wren Okafor
Has a well-articulated value hierarchy, not just a list of preferences. EU federalism and democratic integrity sit at the co-foundational level — instrumental downstream values are expected to follow from these, not the other way around. This matters for how questions should be framed: start from the structural level, not the policy menu.
Rejects strategic voting as a standing principle, not a situational judgment. He has thought about it and closed the door. Don't revisit unless he reopens it.
Comfortable holding positions that are philosophically coherent but socially costly (wealth tax endorsement, SMR support in a green-left context). Consistency-over-optics is a real trait, not a performance.