close T-294, T-296, T-297 (status-bar toggles, edit grouping, re-scroll)

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
2026-06-09 18:35:01 +02:00
co-authored by Claude Opus 4.8
parent 407ed25ab0
commit d7de14800d
2 changed files with 370 additions and 0 deletions
+182
View File
@@ -1831,3 +1831,185 @@ DONE 2026-06-09 — satisfied by D-89 together with T-236. The lightbox-expansio
INSERT INTO ticket_history (ticket_id, field, old_value, new_value, changed_by, changed_at, created_at, updated_at, deleted_at, hash, canonical_version) VALUES ('T-254', 'status', 'ready', 'done', NULL, '2026-06-09 15:55:06', '2026-06-09 15:55:06', '2026-06-09 15:55:06', NULL, 'e07372e7e9662712183808199ac27210', 1) ON CONFLICT(hash) DO NOTHING;
INSERT INTO ticket_history (ticket_id, field, old_value, new_value, changed_by, changed_at, created_at, updated_at, deleted_at, hash, canonical_version) VALUES ('T-297', 'status', 'backlog', 'ready', NULL, '2026-06-09 16:01:58', '2026-06-09 16:01:58', '2026-06-09 16:01:58', NULL, '12474d426c882ddf33efdd4fa6f86f95', 1) ON CONFLICT(hash) DO NOTHING;
INSERT INTO ticket_history (ticket_id, field, old_value, new_value, changed_by, changed_at, created_at, updated_at, deleted_at, hash, canonical_version) VALUES ('T-296', 'status', 'backlog', 'ready', NULL, '2026-06-09 16:02:14', '2026-06-09 16:02:14', '2026-06-09 16:02:14', NULL, '8f3930428725856dcfd8042261852398', 1) ON CONFLICT(hash) DO NOTHING;
INSERT INTO ticket_history (ticket_id, field, old_value, new_value, changed_by, changed_at, created_at, updated_at, deleted_at, hash, canonical_version) VALUES ('T-294', 'description', 'Design and add collapse/expand controls for the left sidebar and the right context pane, along the lines of the reference screenshot (green arrows mark the two intended affordance locations — bottom-left of the sidebar and bottom-right of the context pane).
Scope of this ticket: set up a Frame0 mock to talk through the design before implementing.
Open questions to resolve in the mock:
- Affordance placement: footer/status-bar anchored (as the screenshot arrows suggest) vs. pane-edge chevron.
- Collapsed state: fully hidden vs. thin rail with a re-expand handle.
- Iconography (chevron direction) and hover/active states.
- Whether sidebar and context pane share one control pattern (parity) or differ.
- Keyboard/CLI parity (D-6): each collapse action needs a clide verb.
Deliverable: Frame0 wireframe(s) of collapsed + expanded states for both panes, reviewed before any code.
DESIGN DIRECTION (settled): anchor both toggles on the OUTER EDGES of the center (Claude conversation) pane one on the left edge controlling the sidebar, one on the right edge controlling the context pane. The control stays fixed on the center-pane edge whether the adjacent pane is open or collapsed, so a single button both collapses an open pane and re-opens a collapsed one (chevron flips direction). This avoids needing a separate "re-expand" handle on the collapsed pane.
Implications for the mock:
- Collapsed pane can be fully hidden (no thin rail needed) since the re-open control lives on the center edge.
- Sidebar and context pane share one mirrored control pattern (parity).
- Chevron direction reflects state: points outward to expand, inward to collapse.
IMPLEMENTATION NOTE: the collapse logic already exists no new toggle behaviour needed. Commands `sidebar.collapse` (ctrl+shift+1) and `context.collapse` (ctrl+shift+3) are registered in lib/builtin/default_layout/src/extension.dart, exposed in the command palette + menubar, and call arrangement.toggleCollapsed(Slots.sidebar|contextPanel), returning isCollapsed (D-051, D-054).
So this ticket is scoped to the VISUAL AFFORDANCE only:
- Add the two edge-anchored toggle buttons on the center (Claude) pane''s outer edges.
- On click, invoke the existing `sidebar.collapse` / `context.collapse` commands (do NOT reimplement collapse).
- Read arrangement.isCollapsed(...) to flip the chevron direction per state.
- D-6 CLI/keyboard parity is already satisfied by the existing commands; this adds the mouse affordance.
Mock: docs/design/wireframes/hud/pane-collapse-toggles.{json,png} State A (open) + State B (collapsed).
PLACEMENT REVISED: toggles do NOT float vertically-centered on the pane edges. They live in the BOTTOM STATUS BAR. Each toggle is horizontally pinned to the center pane''s left/right edge, so when a pane collapses the toggle slides along the status bar to that end (open: at the inner pane boundary; collapsed: at the far status-bar end matching where the reference-screenshot arrows pointed). Still mirrored left/right for parity; chevron flips per isCollapsed. Buttons invoke the existing sidebar.collapse / context.collapse commands.
Mock updated: docs/design/wireframes/hud/pane-collapse-toggles.{json,png}.
APPROVED (2026-06-09): pinned-to-edge status-bar placement confirmed by user. Design is settled; ready for implementation.
PLACEMENT FINAL (supersedes "pinned-to-edge"): toggles are FIXED at the far-left and far-right ends of the bottom status bar in every state. They do not slide with the pane edge. Position is constant (muscle memory; always where the reference-screenshot arrows pointed); only the chevron flips per isCollapsed. Left end = sidebar toggle, right end = context toggle. Mirrored for parity. Buttons invoke the existing sidebar.collapse / context.collapse commands.
Mock updated: docs/design/wireframes/hud/pane-collapse-toggles.{json,png}.
SPACE NOTE: the status bar already hosts content at both ends (left: branch / skills count; right: Output / terminal). Fixed-end toggles therefore share that space. Resolution: reserve the OUTERMOST ~24px cell at each end for the toggle and shift the existing status items inward by that width a constant reservation, not a dynamic fight (the toggle never moves or grows). The mock reflects this: status text begins after the left toggle and ends before the right toggle.
GLYPH DECISION: use Phosphor caret-line icons (chevron + edge line), which read as "collapse to the edge":
- caret-line-left -> 0xe132 (CaretLineLeft)
- caret-line-right -> 0xe130 (CaretLineRight)
The glyphs already ship in assets/fonts/phosphor (codepoints.csv lines 150-151) no new dependency. Add two consts to lib/widgets/src/icons/phosphor.dart (PhosphorIcons.caretLineLeft / caretLineRight) during implementation. Chevron-line direction flips per isCollapsed.
RESOLUTION (2026-06-09): considered moving the re-open control into the center (pane edge or center status segment) to dodge the end-of-bar space contention; user chose to KEEP TOGGLES FIXED AT THE STATUS-BAR ENDS (best muscle memory). Final design = v3 mock: caret-line glyphs at fixed far-left/far-right status-bar cells (~24px reserved, side items shifted in), chevron-line flips per isCollapsed, firing existing sidebar.collapse / context.collapse. Design fully settled; ready to implement.', 'Design and add collapse/expand controls for the left sidebar and the right context pane, along the lines of the reference screenshot (green arrows mark the two intended affordance locations bottom-left of the sidebar and bottom-right of the context pane).
Scope of this ticket: set up a Frame0 mock to talk through the design before implementing.
Open questions to resolve in the mock:
- Affordance placement: footer/status-bar anchored (as the screenshot arrows suggest) vs. pane-edge chevron.
- Collapsed state: fully hidden vs. thin rail with a re-expand handle.
- Iconography (chevron direction) and hover/active states.
- Whether sidebar and context pane share one control pattern (parity) or differ.
- Keyboard/CLI parity (D-6): each collapse action needs a clide verb.
Deliverable: Frame0 wireframe(s) of collapsed + expanded states for both panes, reviewed before any code.
DESIGN DIRECTION (settled): anchor both toggles on the OUTER EDGES of the center (Claude conversation) pane one on the left edge controlling the sidebar, one on the right edge controlling the context pane. The control stays fixed on the center-pane edge whether the adjacent pane is open or collapsed, so a single button both collapses an open pane and re-opens a collapsed one (chevron flips direction). This avoids needing a separate "re-expand" handle on the collapsed pane.
Implications for the mock:
- Collapsed pane can be fully hidden (no thin rail needed) since the re-open control lives on the center edge.
- Sidebar and context pane share one mirrored control pattern (parity).
- Chevron direction reflects state: points outward to expand, inward to collapse.
IMPLEMENTATION NOTE: the collapse logic already exists no new toggle behaviour needed. Commands `sidebar.collapse` (ctrl+shift+1) and `context.collapse` (ctrl+shift+3) are registered in lib/builtin/default_layout/src/extension.dart, exposed in the command palette + menubar, and call arrangement.toggleCollapsed(Slots.sidebar|contextPanel), returning isCollapsed (D-051, D-054).
So this ticket is scoped to the VISUAL AFFORDANCE only:
- Add the two edge-anchored toggle buttons on the center (Claude) pane''s outer edges.
- On click, invoke the existing `sidebar.collapse` / `context.collapse` commands (do NOT reimplement collapse).
- Read arrangement.isCollapsed(...) to flip the chevron direction per state.
- D-6 CLI/keyboard parity is already satisfied by the existing commands; this adds the mouse affordance.
Mock: docs/design/wireframes/hud/pane-collapse-toggles.{json,png} State A (open) + State B (collapsed).
PLACEMENT REVISED: toggles do NOT float vertically-centered on the pane edges. They live in the BOTTOM STATUS BAR. Each toggle is horizontally pinned to the center pane''s left/right edge, so when a pane collapses the toggle slides along the status bar to that end (open: at the inner pane boundary; collapsed: at the far status-bar end matching where the reference-screenshot arrows pointed). Still mirrored left/right for parity; chevron flips per isCollapsed. Buttons invoke the existing sidebar.collapse / context.collapse commands.
Mock updated: docs/design/wireframes/hud/pane-collapse-toggles.{json,png}.
APPROVED (2026-06-09): pinned-to-edge status-bar placement confirmed by user. Design is settled; ready for implementation.
PLACEMENT FINAL (supersedes "pinned-to-edge"): toggles are FIXED at the far-left and far-right ends of the bottom status bar in every state. They do not slide with the pane edge. Position is constant (muscle memory; always where the reference-screenshot arrows pointed); only the chevron flips per isCollapsed. Left end = sidebar toggle, right end = context toggle. Mirrored for parity. Buttons invoke the existing sidebar.collapse / context.collapse commands.
Mock updated: docs/design/wireframes/hud/pane-collapse-toggles.{json,png}.
SPACE NOTE: the status bar already hosts content at both ends (left: branch / skills count; right: Output / terminal). Fixed-end toggles therefore share that space. Resolution: reserve the OUTERMOST ~24px cell at each end for the toggle and shift the existing status items inward by that width a constant reservation, not a dynamic fight (the toggle never moves or grows). The mock reflects this: status text begins after the left toggle and ends before the right toggle.
GLYPH DECISION: use Phosphor caret-line icons (chevron + edge line), which read as "collapse to the edge":
- caret-line-left -> 0xe132 (CaretLineLeft)
- caret-line-right -> 0xe130 (CaretLineRight)
The glyphs already ship in assets/fonts/phosphor (codepoints.csv lines 150-151) no new dependency. Add two consts to lib/widgets/src/icons/phosphor.dart (PhosphorIcons.caretLineLeft / caretLineRight) during implementation. Chevron-line direction flips per isCollapsed.
RESOLUTION (2026-06-09): considered moving the re-open control into the center (pane edge or center status segment) to dodge the end-of-bar space contention; user chose to KEEP TOGGLES FIXED AT THE STATUS-BAR ENDS (best muscle memory). Final design = v3 mock: caret-line glyphs at fixed far-left/far-right status-bar cells (~24px reserved, side items shifted in), chevron-line flips per isCollapsed, firing existing sidebar.collapse / context.collapse. Design fully settled; ready to implement.
DONE 2026-06-09 (commit). Fixed ~24px caret-line toggles bookend the status bar (StatusbarHost), flip chevron per arrangement.isCollapsed, fire existing sidebar.collapse/context.collapse. Visual affordance only. Tests: app_collapse_toggle_test + updated app_statusbar_test.', NULL, '2026-06-09 16:34:46', '2026-06-09 16:34:46', '2026-06-09 16:34:46', NULL, '96263b16de5104d6579d5b010e105b16', 1) ON CONFLICT(hash) DO NOTHING;
INSERT INTO ticket_history (ticket_id, field, old_value, new_value, changed_by, changed_at, created_at, updated_at, deleted_at, hash, canonical_version) VALUES ('T-294', 'status', 'ready', 'done', NULL, '2026-06-09 16:34:46', '2026-06-09 16:34:46', '2026-06-09 16:34:46', NULL, 'd0ac2758ff994f261a6b774c25ff61aa', 1) ON CONFLICT(hash) DO NOTHING;
INSERT INTO ticket_history (ticket_id, field, old_value, new_value, changed_by, changed_at, created_at, updated_at, deleted_at, hash, canonical_version) VALUES ('T-297', 'description', 'When the bottom input area changes height, the conversation view does not re-scroll to the new viewport bottom, so the last bit of content is left hidden behind the newly-sized box.
Trigger: anything that resizes the bottom interaction zone (D-78) e.g. opening a permission dialog or the AskUserQuestion UI, which replace/expand the composer. The taller box shrinks the conversation viewport from the bottom, but the scroll offset isn''t adjusted, so content that was at the bottom edge is now occluded.
Expected: when the interaction zone grows, the conversation re-anchors so the previously-visible bottom content stays visible above the box (preserve bottom-anchoring / keep the tail in view). Symmetric on shrink no leftover gap when the box collapses back.
Repro:
1. Scroll the Claude conversation to the bottom (tail in view).
2. Trigger a permission prompt or AskUserQuestion (interaction zone expands).
3. Observed: a strip of the last message/card is hidden behind the enlarged input box.
4. Expected: view scrolls so that content remains fully visible above the box.
Notes:
- Likely the scroll controller doesn''t react to the composer/interaction-zone height change (no re-scroll on viewport-inset/size change). Audit the conversation view''s scroll handling around interaction-zone show/hide (D-78) and on keyboard/box resize.
- Affects the Claude conversation panel.', 'When the bottom input area changes height, the conversation view does not re-scroll to the new viewport bottom, so the last bit of content is left hidden behind the newly-sized box.
Trigger: anything that resizes the bottom interaction zone (D-78) e.g. opening a permission dialog or the AskUserQuestion UI, which replace/expand the composer. The taller box shrinks the conversation viewport from the bottom, but the scroll offset isn''t adjusted, so content that was at the bottom edge is now occluded.
Expected: when the interaction zone grows, the conversation re-anchors so the previously-visible bottom content stays visible above the box (preserve bottom-anchoring / keep the tail in view). Symmetric on shrink no leftover gap when the box collapses back.
Repro:
1. Scroll the Claude conversation to the bottom (tail in view).
2. Trigger a permission prompt or AskUserQuestion (interaction zone expands).
3. Observed: a strip of the last message/card is hidden behind the enlarged input box.
4. Expected: view scrolls so that content remains fully visible above the box.
Notes:
- Likely the scroll controller doesn''t react to the composer/interaction-zone height change (no re-scroll on viewport-inset/size change). Audit the conversation view''s scroll handling around interaction-zone show/hide (D-78) and on keyboard/box resize.
- Affects the Claude conversation panel.
DONE 2026-06-09 (commit). conversation_view tracks at-bottom + a LayoutBuilder re-jumps to the tail when the viewport height changes (interaction-zone resize, D-78), only when pinned. Tests: conversation_scroll_test.', NULL, '2026-06-09 16:34:46', '2026-06-09 16:34:46', '2026-06-09 16:34:46', NULL, '4a480f458656a560dbf8ec4dc37b7f06', 1) ON CONFLICT(hash) DO NOTHING;
INSERT INTO ticket_history (ticket_id, field, old_value, new_value, changed_by, changed_at, created_at, updated_at, deleted_at, hash, canonical_version) VALUES ('T-297', 'status', 'ready', 'done', NULL, '2026-06-09 16:34:46', '2026-06-09 16:34:46', '2026-06-09 16:34:46', NULL, '5e057b905d14d1bddbb58ad4e72dc6cd', 1) ON CONFLICT(hash) DO NOTHING;
INSERT INTO ticket_history (ticket_id, field, old_value, new_value, changed_by, changed_at, created_at, updated_at, deleted_at, hash, canonical_version) VALUES ('T-296', 'description', 'When Claude makes multiple subsequent edits to the SAME file, bundle them into a single collapsed holder card instead of rendering each edit as its own card — mirroring how we already fold meta/activity runs.
Behaviour:
- Detect a run of consecutive edits targeting the same file_path and group them into one ClideHolderCard (the shared container from T-266; see _ActivityCard in lib/builtin/claude/src/conversation_view.dart:681).
- Collapsed (default): one-line ticker of the latest edit + a count label.
- Show the count as "# edits" (e.g. "3 edits" / "1 edit"), NOT "# steps". The existing activity card uses stepLabel = ''$count steps'' at conversation_view.dart:683; this run wants an edits-flavoured label.
- Expanded: every individual edit, each with its full report bundle, do NOT drop or summarise away any information. All per-edit detail must remain reachable on expand.
Notes:
- Reuse the existing ClideHolderCard / folding machinery rather than building a new card.
- Grouping breaks when the file_path changes or a non-edit step interleaves (consecutive-same-file only), matching the ''subsequent edits to the same file'' wording.
- Parity with the existing meta/activity folding (T-230) same collapse/expand affordance, just an edits-labelled run.
WORKED EXAMPLE (from user screenshot, clide_markdown.dart run): the current stream renders 11 stacked cards 3x "Edit clide_markdown.dart", then a folded "Read … 2 steps" holder, then 7x "Edit clide_markdown.dart". With this feature it collapses to THREE cards:
- [3 edits] (the first edit run)
- [2 steps] (the existing Read holder unchanged; this is what splits the edit run)
- [7 edits] (the second edit run)
Confirms the split rule: an interleaving non-edit step (here the folded Read run) breaks the consecutive-same-file edit grouping into two separate edit cards. Same-file edits with nothing between them collapse into one "# edits" card.
STATUS INDICATOR (live tick reuse): the bundled edits card carries ONE header status indicator that reuses the existing per-step success tick, driven by the latest edit''s state:
- edit in flight -> spinner
- edit completed -> success check (the current green tick)
- next edit starts -> back to spinner
- ...repeat, settling on check when the final edit in the run completes (or the error glyph if one fails).
So the collapsed card''s indicator animates spinner<->check as the run grows, rather than showing a static tick. Each individual edit keeps its own tick in the expanded list (unchanged); this is the aggregate indicator on the holder header/ticker. Mirror the same treatment for the existing "# steps" activity card if it doesn''t already do this.', 'When Claude makes multiple subsequent edits to the SAME file, bundle them into a single collapsed holder card instead of rendering each edit as its own card mirroring how we already fold meta/activity runs.
Behaviour:
- Detect a run of consecutive edits targeting the same file_path and group them into one ClideHolderCard (the shared container from T-266; see _ActivityCard in lib/builtin/claude/src/conversation_view.dart:681).
- Collapsed (default): one-line ticker of the latest edit + a count label.
- Show the count as "# edits" (e.g. "3 edits" / "1 edit"), NOT "# steps". The existing activity card uses stepLabel = ''$count steps'' at conversation_view.dart:683; this run wants an edits-flavoured label.
- Expanded: every individual edit, each with its full report bundle, do NOT drop or summarise away any information. All per-edit detail must remain reachable on expand.
Notes:
- Reuse the existing ClideHolderCard / folding machinery rather than building a new card.
- Grouping breaks when the file_path changes or a non-edit step interleaves (consecutive-same-file only), matching the ''subsequent edits to the same file'' wording.
- Parity with the existing meta/activity folding (T-230) same collapse/expand affordance, just an edits-labelled run.
WORKED EXAMPLE (from user screenshot, clide_markdown.dart run): the current stream renders 11 stacked cards 3x "Edit clide_markdown.dart", then a folded "Read … 2 steps" holder, then 7x "Edit clide_markdown.dart". With this feature it collapses to THREE cards:
- [3 edits] (the first edit run)
- [2 steps] (the existing Read holder unchanged; this is what splits the edit run)
- [7 edits] (the second edit run)
Confirms the split rule: an interleaving non-edit step (here the folded Read run) breaks the consecutive-same-file edit grouping into two separate edit cards. Same-file edits with nothing between them collapse into one "# edits" card.
STATUS INDICATOR (live tick reuse): the bundled edits card carries ONE header status indicator that reuses the existing per-step success tick, driven by the latest edit''s state:
- edit in flight -> spinner
- edit completed -> success check (the current green tick)
- next edit starts -> back to spinner
- ...repeat, settling on check when the final edit in the run completes (or the error glyph if one fails).
So the collapsed card''s indicator animates spinner<->check as the run grows, rather than showing a static tick. Each individual edit keeps its own tick in the expanded list (unchanged); this is the aggregate indicator on the holder header/ticker. Mirror the same treatment for the existing "# steps" activity card if it doesn''t already do this.
DONE 2026-06-09 (commit). coalesceEditRuns folds consecutive same-file edits into one ''# edits'' ClideHolderCard; aggregate live status via new ClideStatusIndicator (running/success/error) + ClideSpinner (logo-mark, 3D Y rotation, reduced-motion aware), shared with the activity card. Per user: spinner is a self-contained component (not built on ConversationCard''s mark) with an AnimatedSwitcher seam for a richer spinnercheck transition later. Tests: activity_cluster_test (coalesce), conversation_view_test (edits card), clide_status_indicator_test.', NULL, '2026-06-09 16:34:46', '2026-06-09 16:34:46', '2026-06-09 16:34:46', NULL, '899916f67fe3c12a2ac4d231630bd34d', 1) ON CONFLICT(hash) DO NOTHING;
INSERT INTO ticket_history (ticket_id, field, old_value, new_value, changed_by, changed_at, created_at, updated_at, deleted_at, hash, canonical_version) VALUES ('T-296', 'status', 'ready', 'done', NULL, '2026-06-09 16:34:46', '2026-06-09 16:34:46', '2026-06-09 16:34:46', NULL, '9c76b18710ed6e17c878dea8f92ad881', 1) ON CONFLICT(hash) DO NOTHING;
+188
View File
@@ -3197,3 +3197,191 @@ Expected: the input box sits correctly flush to the window bottom (or with consi
Notes:
- Audit the bottom-of-window layout stack (composer / interaction zone + status bar). The composer should bottom-anchor independently of the status bar''s visibility.
- Related to the bottom interaction zone work (D-78) and may interact with T-297 (scroll on input resize). Also relevant once the status-bar collapse toggles (T-294) can change what''s in the bar.', 'backlog', 'medium', NULL, NULL, NULL, '2026-06-09 16:06:41', '2026-06-09 16:06:41', NULL, 'b4bc1e798b51ba9cab140777ff40972a', 1) ON CONFLICT(id) DO UPDATE SET type=excluded.type, parent_id=excluded.parent_id, title=excluded.title, description=excluded.description, status=excluded.status, priority=excluded.priority, assigned_to=excluded.assigned_to, team=excluded.team, decision_ref=excluded.decision_ref, updated_at=excluded.updated_at, deleted_at=excluded.deleted_at, hash=excluded.hash, canonical_version=excluded.canonical_version WHERE excluded.updated_at > tickets.updated_at OR (excluded.updated_at = tickets.updated_at AND excluded.hash > tickets.hash);
INSERT INTO tickets (id, type, parent_id, title, description, status, priority, assigned_to, team, decision_ref, created_at, updated_at, deleted_at, hash, canonical_version) VALUES ('T-294', 'task', 'T-276', 'Collapse buttons for sidebar and context pane', 'Design and add collapse/expand controls for the left sidebar and the right context pane, along the lines of the reference screenshot (green arrows mark the two intended affordance locations — bottom-left of the sidebar and bottom-right of the context pane).
Scope of this ticket: set up a Frame0 mock to talk through the design before implementing.
Open questions to resolve in the mock:
- Affordance placement: footer/status-bar anchored (as the screenshot arrows suggest) vs. pane-edge chevron.
- Collapsed state: fully hidden vs. thin rail with a re-expand handle.
- Iconography (chevron direction) and hover/active states.
- Whether sidebar and context pane share one control pattern (parity) or differ.
- Keyboard/CLI parity (D-6): each collapse action needs a clide verb.
Deliverable: Frame0 wireframe(s) of collapsed + expanded states for both panes, reviewed before any code.
DESIGN DIRECTION (settled): anchor both toggles on the OUTER EDGES of the center (Claude conversation) pane one on the left edge controlling the sidebar, one on the right edge controlling the context pane. The control stays fixed on the center-pane edge whether the adjacent pane is open or collapsed, so a single button both collapses an open pane and re-opens a collapsed one (chevron flips direction). This avoids needing a separate "re-expand" handle on the collapsed pane.
Implications for the mock:
- Collapsed pane can be fully hidden (no thin rail needed) since the re-open control lives on the center edge.
- Sidebar and context pane share one mirrored control pattern (parity).
- Chevron direction reflects state: points outward to expand, inward to collapse.
IMPLEMENTATION NOTE: the collapse logic already exists no new toggle behaviour needed. Commands `sidebar.collapse` (ctrl+shift+1) and `context.collapse` (ctrl+shift+3) are registered in lib/builtin/default_layout/src/extension.dart, exposed in the command palette + menubar, and call arrangement.toggleCollapsed(Slots.sidebar|contextPanel), returning isCollapsed (D-051, D-054).
So this ticket is scoped to the VISUAL AFFORDANCE only:
- Add the two edge-anchored toggle buttons on the center (Claude) pane''s outer edges.
- On click, invoke the existing `sidebar.collapse` / `context.collapse` commands (do NOT reimplement collapse).
- Read arrangement.isCollapsed(...) to flip the chevron direction per state.
- D-6 CLI/keyboard parity is already satisfied by the existing commands; this adds the mouse affordance.
Mock: docs/design/wireframes/hud/pane-collapse-toggles.{json,png} State A (open) + State B (collapsed).
PLACEMENT REVISED: toggles do NOT float vertically-centered on the pane edges. They live in the BOTTOM STATUS BAR. Each toggle is horizontally pinned to the center pane''s left/right edge, so when a pane collapses the toggle slides along the status bar to that end (open: at the inner pane boundary; collapsed: at the far status-bar end matching where the reference-screenshot arrows pointed). Still mirrored left/right for parity; chevron flips per isCollapsed. Buttons invoke the existing sidebar.collapse / context.collapse commands.
Mock updated: docs/design/wireframes/hud/pane-collapse-toggles.{json,png}.
APPROVED (2026-06-09): pinned-to-edge status-bar placement confirmed by user. Design is settled; ready for implementation.
PLACEMENT FINAL (supersedes "pinned-to-edge"): toggles are FIXED at the far-left and far-right ends of the bottom status bar in every state. They do not slide with the pane edge. Position is constant (muscle memory; always where the reference-screenshot arrows pointed); only the chevron flips per isCollapsed. Left end = sidebar toggle, right end = context toggle. Mirrored for parity. Buttons invoke the existing sidebar.collapse / context.collapse commands.
Mock updated: docs/design/wireframes/hud/pane-collapse-toggles.{json,png}.
SPACE NOTE: the status bar already hosts content at both ends (left: branch / skills count; right: Output / terminal). Fixed-end toggles therefore share that space. Resolution: reserve the OUTERMOST ~24px cell at each end for the toggle and shift the existing status items inward by that width a constant reservation, not a dynamic fight (the toggle never moves or grows). The mock reflects this: status text begins after the left toggle and ends before the right toggle.
GLYPH DECISION: use Phosphor caret-line icons (chevron + edge line), which read as "collapse to the edge":
- caret-line-left -> 0xe132 (CaretLineLeft)
- caret-line-right -> 0xe130 (CaretLineRight)
The glyphs already ship in assets/fonts/phosphor (codepoints.csv lines 150-151) no new dependency. Add two consts to lib/widgets/src/icons/phosphor.dart (PhosphorIcons.caretLineLeft / caretLineRight) during implementation. Chevron-line direction flips per isCollapsed.
RESOLUTION (2026-06-09): considered moving the re-open control into the center (pane edge or center status segment) to dodge the end-of-bar space contention; user chose to KEEP TOGGLES FIXED AT THE STATUS-BAR ENDS (best muscle memory). Final design = v3 mock: caret-line glyphs at fixed far-left/far-right status-bar cells (~24px reserved, side items shifted in), chevron-line flips per isCollapsed, firing existing sidebar.collapse / context.collapse. Design fully settled; ready to implement.
DONE 2026-06-09 (commit). Fixed ~24px caret-line toggles bookend the status bar (StatusbarHost), flip chevron per arrangement.isCollapsed, fire existing sidebar.collapse/context.collapse. Visual affordance only. Tests: app_collapse_toggle_test + updated app_statusbar_test.', 'ready', 'medium', NULL, NULL, NULL, '2026-06-09 15:18:22', '2026-06-09 16:34:46', NULL, '2aa78ca6d9972c7680c81d904cb1a11b', 1) ON CONFLICT(id) DO UPDATE SET type=excluded.type, parent_id=excluded.parent_id, title=excluded.title, description=excluded.description, status=excluded.status, priority=excluded.priority, assigned_to=excluded.assigned_to, team=excluded.team, decision_ref=excluded.decision_ref, updated_at=excluded.updated_at, deleted_at=excluded.deleted_at, hash=excluded.hash, canonical_version=excluded.canonical_version WHERE excluded.updated_at > tickets.updated_at OR (excluded.updated_at = tickets.updated_at AND excluded.hash > tickets.hash);
INSERT INTO tickets (id, type, parent_id, title, description, status, priority, assigned_to, team, decision_ref, created_at, updated_at, deleted_at, hash, canonical_version) VALUES ('T-294', 'task', 'T-276', 'Collapse buttons for sidebar and context pane', 'Design and add collapse/expand controls for the left sidebar and the right context pane, along the lines of the reference screenshot (green arrows mark the two intended affordance locations — bottom-left of the sidebar and bottom-right of the context pane).
Scope of this ticket: set up a Frame0 mock to talk through the design before implementing.
Open questions to resolve in the mock:
- Affordance placement: footer/status-bar anchored (as the screenshot arrows suggest) vs. pane-edge chevron.
- Collapsed state: fully hidden vs. thin rail with a re-expand handle.
- Iconography (chevron direction) and hover/active states.
- Whether sidebar and context pane share one control pattern (parity) or differ.
- Keyboard/CLI parity (D-6): each collapse action needs a clide verb.
Deliverable: Frame0 wireframe(s) of collapsed + expanded states for both panes, reviewed before any code.
DESIGN DIRECTION (settled): anchor both toggles on the OUTER EDGES of the center (Claude conversation) pane one on the left edge controlling the sidebar, one on the right edge controlling the context pane. The control stays fixed on the center-pane edge whether the adjacent pane is open or collapsed, so a single button both collapses an open pane and re-opens a collapsed one (chevron flips direction). This avoids needing a separate "re-expand" handle on the collapsed pane.
Implications for the mock:
- Collapsed pane can be fully hidden (no thin rail needed) since the re-open control lives on the center edge.
- Sidebar and context pane share one mirrored control pattern (parity).
- Chevron direction reflects state: points outward to expand, inward to collapse.
IMPLEMENTATION NOTE: the collapse logic already exists no new toggle behaviour needed. Commands `sidebar.collapse` (ctrl+shift+1) and `context.collapse` (ctrl+shift+3) are registered in lib/builtin/default_layout/src/extension.dart, exposed in the command palette + menubar, and call arrangement.toggleCollapsed(Slots.sidebar|contextPanel), returning isCollapsed (D-051, D-054).
So this ticket is scoped to the VISUAL AFFORDANCE only:
- Add the two edge-anchored toggle buttons on the center (Claude) pane''s outer edges.
- On click, invoke the existing `sidebar.collapse` / `context.collapse` commands (do NOT reimplement collapse).
- Read arrangement.isCollapsed(...) to flip the chevron direction per state.
- D-6 CLI/keyboard parity is already satisfied by the existing commands; this adds the mouse affordance.
Mock: docs/design/wireframes/hud/pane-collapse-toggles.{json,png} State A (open) + State B (collapsed).
PLACEMENT REVISED: toggles do NOT float vertically-centered on the pane edges. They live in the BOTTOM STATUS BAR. Each toggle is horizontally pinned to the center pane''s left/right edge, so when a pane collapses the toggle slides along the status bar to that end (open: at the inner pane boundary; collapsed: at the far status-bar end matching where the reference-screenshot arrows pointed). Still mirrored left/right for parity; chevron flips per isCollapsed. Buttons invoke the existing sidebar.collapse / context.collapse commands.
Mock updated: docs/design/wireframes/hud/pane-collapse-toggles.{json,png}.
APPROVED (2026-06-09): pinned-to-edge status-bar placement confirmed by user. Design is settled; ready for implementation.
PLACEMENT FINAL (supersedes "pinned-to-edge"): toggles are FIXED at the far-left and far-right ends of the bottom status bar in every state. They do not slide with the pane edge. Position is constant (muscle memory; always where the reference-screenshot arrows pointed); only the chevron flips per isCollapsed. Left end = sidebar toggle, right end = context toggle. Mirrored for parity. Buttons invoke the existing sidebar.collapse / context.collapse commands.
Mock updated: docs/design/wireframes/hud/pane-collapse-toggles.{json,png}.
SPACE NOTE: the status bar already hosts content at both ends (left: branch / skills count; right: Output / terminal). Fixed-end toggles therefore share that space. Resolution: reserve the OUTERMOST ~24px cell at each end for the toggle and shift the existing status items inward by that width a constant reservation, not a dynamic fight (the toggle never moves or grows). The mock reflects this: status text begins after the left toggle and ends before the right toggle.
GLYPH DECISION: use Phosphor caret-line icons (chevron + edge line), which read as "collapse to the edge":
- caret-line-left -> 0xe132 (CaretLineLeft)
- caret-line-right -> 0xe130 (CaretLineRight)
The glyphs already ship in assets/fonts/phosphor (codepoints.csv lines 150-151) no new dependency. Add two consts to lib/widgets/src/icons/phosphor.dart (PhosphorIcons.caretLineLeft / caretLineRight) during implementation. Chevron-line direction flips per isCollapsed.
RESOLUTION (2026-06-09): considered moving the re-open control into the center (pane edge or center status segment) to dodge the end-of-bar space contention; user chose to KEEP TOGGLES FIXED AT THE STATUS-BAR ENDS (best muscle memory). Final design = v3 mock: caret-line glyphs at fixed far-left/far-right status-bar cells (~24px reserved, side items shifted in), chevron-line flips per isCollapsed, firing existing sidebar.collapse / context.collapse. Design fully settled; ready to implement.
DONE 2026-06-09 (commit). Fixed ~24px caret-line toggles bookend the status bar (StatusbarHost), flip chevron per arrangement.isCollapsed, fire existing sidebar.collapse/context.collapse. Visual affordance only. Tests: app_collapse_toggle_test + updated app_statusbar_test.', 'done', 'medium', NULL, NULL, NULL, '2026-06-09 15:18:22', '2026-06-09 16:34:46', NULL, '7c9522d4eb05a8d5c0c9ff1b0d28a90d', 1) ON CONFLICT(id) DO UPDATE SET type=excluded.type, parent_id=excluded.parent_id, title=excluded.title, description=excluded.description, status=excluded.status, priority=excluded.priority, assigned_to=excluded.assigned_to, team=excluded.team, decision_ref=excluded.decision_ref, updated_at=excluded.updated_at, deleted_at=excluded.deleted_at, hash=excluded.hash, canonical_version=excluded.canonical_version WHERE excluded.updated_at > tickets.updated_at OR (excluded.updated_at = tickets.updated_at AND excluded.hash > tickets.hash);
INSERT INTO tickets (id, type, parent_id, title, description, status, priority, assigned_to, team, decision_ref, created_at, updated_at, deleted_at, hash, canonical_version) VALUES ('T-297', 'bug', 'T-276', 'Conversation doesn''t re-scroll when the bottom input resizes (content hides behind it)', 'When the bottom input area changes height, the conversation view does not re-scroll to the new viewport bottom, so the last bit of content is left hidden behind the newly-sized box.
Trigger: anything that resizes the bottom interaction zone (D-78) e.g. opening a permission dialog or the AskUserQuestion UI, which replace/expand the composer. The taller box shrinks the conversation viewport from the bottom, but the scroll offset isn''t adjusted, so content that was at the bottom edge is now occluded.
Expected: when the interaction zone grows, the conversation re-anchors so the previously-visible bottom content stays visible above the box (preserve bottom-anchoring / keep the tail in view). Symmetric on shrink no leftover gap when the box collapses back.
Repro:
1. Scroll the Claude conversation to the bottom (tail in view).
2. Trigger a permission prompt or AskUserQuestion (interaction zone expands).
3. Observed: a strip of the last message/card is hidden behind the enlarged input box.
4. Expected: view scrolls so that content remains fully visible above the box.
Notes:
- Likely the scroll controller doesn''t react to the composer/interaction-zone height change (no re-scroll on viewport-inset/size change). Audit the conversation view''s scroll handling around interaction-zone show/hide (D-78) and on keyboard/box resize.
- Affects the Claude conversation panel.
DONE 2026-06-09 (commit). conversation_view tracks at-bottom + a LayoutBuilder re-jumps to the tail when the viewport height changes (interaction-zone resize, D-78), only when pinned. Tests: conversation_scroll_test.', 'ready', 'medium', NULL, NULL, NULL, '2026-06-09 16:01:09', '2026-06-09 16:34:46', NULL, '2aefbb0ada37aeb34e3886a037f6687c', 1) ON CONFLICT(id) DO UPDATE SET type=excluded.type, parent_id=excluded.parent_id, title=excluded.title, description=excluded.description, status=excluded.status, priority=excluded.priority, assigned_to=excluded.assigned_to, team=excluded.team, decision_ref=excluded.decision_ref, updated_at=excluded.updated_at, deleted_at=excluded.deleted_at, hash=excluded.hash, canonical_version=excluded.canonical_version WHERE excluded.updated_at > tickets.updated_at OR (excluded.updated_at = tickets.updated_at AND excluded.hash > tickets.hash);
INSERT INTO tickets (id, type, parent_id, title, description, status, priority, assigned_to, team, decision_ref, created_at, updated_at, deleted_at, hash, canonical_version) VALUES ('T-297', 'bug', 'T-276', 'Conversation doesn''t re-scroll when the bottom input resizes (content hides behind it)', 'When the bottom input area changes height, the conversation view does not re-scroll to the new viewport bottom, so the last bit of content is left hidden behind the newly-sized box.
Trigger: anything that resizes the bottom interaction zone (D-78) e.g. opening a permission dialog or the AskUserQuestion UI, which replace/expand the composer. The taller box shrinks the conversation viewport from the bottom, but the scroll offset isn''t adjusted, so content that was at the bottom edge is now occluded.
Expected: when the interaction zone grows, the conversation re-anchors so the previously-visible bottom content stays visible above the box (preserve bottom-anchoring / keep the tail in view). Symmetric on shrink no leftover gap when the box collapses back.
Repro:
1. Scroll the Claude conversation to the bottom (tail in view).
2. Trigger a permission prompt or AskUserQuestion (interaction zone expands).
3. Observed: a strip of the last message/card is hidden behind the enlarged input box.
4. Expected: view scrolls so that content remains fully visible above the box.
Notes:
- Likely the scroll controller doesn''t react to the composer/interaction-zone height change (no re-scroll on viewport-inset/size change). Audit the conversation view''s scroll handling around interaction-zone show/hide (D-78) and on keyboard/box resize.
- Affects the Claude conversation panel.
DONE 2026-06-09 (commit). conversation_view tracks at-bottom + a LayoutBuilder re-jumps to the tail when the viewport height changes (interaction-zone resize, D-78), only when pinned. Tests: conversation_scroll_test.', 'done', 'medium', NULL, NULL, NULL, '2026-06-09 16:01:09', '2026-06-09 16:34:46', NULL, 'c908227eea50bb4b9ef928b484c56efb', 1) ON CONFLICT(id) DO UPDATE SET type=excluded.type, parent_id=excluded.parent_id, title=excluded.title, description=excluded.description, status=excluded.status, priority=excluded.priority, assigned_to=excluded.assigned_to, team=excluded.team, decision_ref=excluded.decision_ref, updated_at=excluded.updated_at, deleted_at=excluded.deleted_at, hash=excluded.hash, canonical_version=excluded.canonical_version WHERE excluded.updated_at > tickets.updated_at OR (excluded.updated_at = tickets.updated_at AND excluded.hash > tickets.hash);
INSERT INTO tickets (id, type, parent_id, title, description, status, priority, assigned_to, team, decision_ref, created_at, updated_at, deleted_at, hash, canonical_version) VALUES ('T-296', 'task', 'T-276', 'Group consecutive edits to the same file into one collapsed card', 'When Claude makes multiple subsequent edits to the SAME file, bundle them into a single collapsed holder card instead of rendering each edit as its own card — mirroring how we already fold meta/activity runs.
Behaviour:
- Detect a run of consecutive edits targeting the same file_path and group them into one ClideHolderCard (the shared container from T-266; see _ActivityCard in lib/builtin/claude/src/conversation_view.dart:681).
- Collapsed (default): one-line ticker of the latest edit + a count label.
- Show the count as "# edits" (e.g. "3 edits" / "1 edit"), NOT "# steps". The existing activity card uses stepLabel = ''$count steps'' at conversation_view.dart:683; this run wants an edits-flavoured label.
- Expanded: every individual edit, each with its full report bundle, do NOT drop or summarise away any information. All per-edit detail must remain reachable on expand.
Notes:
- Reuse the existing ClideHolderCard / folding machinery rather than building a new card.
- Grouping breaks when the file_path changes or a non-edit step interleaves (consecutive-same-file only), matching the ''subsequent edits to the same file'' wording.
- Parity with the existing meta/activity folding (T-230) same collapse/expand affordance, just an edits-labelled run.
WORKED EXAMPLE (from user screenshot, clide_markdown.dart run): the current stream renders 11 stacked cards 3x "Edit clide_markdown.dart", then a folded "Read … 2 steps" holder, then 7x "Edit clide_markdown.dart". With this feature it collapses to THREE cards:
- [3 edits] (the first edit run)
- [2 steps] (the existing Read holder unchanged; this is what splits the edit run)
- [7 edits] (the second edit run)
Confirms the split rule: an interleaving non-edit step (here the folded Read run) breaks the consecutive-same-file edit grouping into two separate edit cards. Same-file edits with nothing between them collapse into one "# edits" card.
STATUS INDICATOR (live tick reuse): the bundled edits card carries ONE header status indicator that reuses the existing per-step success tick, driven by the latest edit''s state:
- edit in flight -> spinner
- edit completed -> success check (the current green tick)
- next edit starts -> back to spinner
- ...repeat, settling on check when the final edit in the run completes (or the error glyph if one fails).
So the collapsed card''s indicator animates spinner<->check as the run grows, rather than showing a static tick. Each individual edit keeps its own tick in the expanded list (unchanged); this is the aggregate indicator on the holder header/ticker. Mirror the same treatment for the existing "# steps" activity card if it doesn''t already do this.
DONE 2026-06-09 (commit). coalesceEditRuns folds consecutive same-file edits into one ''# edits'' ClideHolderCard; aggregate live status via new ClideStatusIndicator (running/success/error) + ClideSpinner (logo-mark, 3D Y rotation, reduced-motion aware), shared with the activity card. Per user: spinner is a self-contained component (not built on ConversationCard''s mark) with an AnimatedSwitcher seam for a richer spinnercheck transition later. Tests: activity_cluster_test (coalesce), conversation_view_test (edits card), clide_status_indicator_test.', 'ready', 'medium', NULL, NULL, NULL, '2026-06-09 15:43:58', '2026-06-09 16:34:46', NULL, '587bce6258997671b106a410cc87bc5a', 1) ON CONFLICT(id) DO UPDATE SET type=excluded.type, parent_id=excluded.parent_id, title=excluded.title, description=excluded.description, status=excluded.status, priority=excluded.priority, assigned_to=excluded.assigned_to, team=excluded.team, decision_ref=excluded.decision_ref, updated_at=excluded.updated_at, deleted_at=excluded.deleted_at, hash=excluded.hash, canonical_version=excluded.canonical_version WHERE excluded.updated_at > tickets.updated_at OR (excluded.updated_at = tickets.updated_at AND excluded.hash > tickets.hash);
INSERT INTO tickets (id, type, parent_id, title, description, status, priority, assigned_to, team, decision_ref, created_at, updated_at, deleted_at, hash, canonical_version) VALUES ('T-296', 'task', 'T-276', 'Group consecutive edits to the same file into one collapsed card', 'When Claude makes multiple subsequent edits to the SAME file, bundle them into a single collapsed holder card instead of rendering each edit as its own card — mirroring how we already fold meta/activity runs.
Behaviour:
- Detect a run of consecutive edits targeting the same file_path and group them into one ClideHolderCard (the shared container from T-266; see _ActivityCard in lib/builtin/claude/src/conversation_view.dart:681).
- Collapsed (default): one-line ticker of the latest edit + a count label.
- Show the count as "# edits" (e.g. "3 edits" / "1 edit"), NOT "# steps". The existing activity card uses stepLabel = ''$count steps'' at conversation_view.dart:683; this run wants an edits-flavoured label.
- Expanded: every individual edit, each with its full report bundle, do NOT drop or summarise away any information. All per-edit detail must remain reachable on expand.
Notes:
- Reuse the existing ClideHolderCard / folding machinery rather than building a new card.
- Grouping breaks when the file_path changes or a non-edit step interleaves (consecutive-same-file only), matching the ''subsequent edits to the same file'' wording.
- Parity with the existing meta/activity folding (T-230) same collapse/expand affordance, just an edits-labelled run.
WORKED EXAMPLE (from user screenshot, clide_markdown.dart run): the current stream renders 11 stacked cards 3x "Edit clide_markdown.dart", then a folded "Read … 2 steps" holder, then 7x "Edit clide_markdown.dart". With this feature it collapses to THREE cards:
- [3 edits] (the first edit run)
- [2 steps] (the existing Read holder unchanged; this is what splits the edit run)
- [7 edits] (the second edit run)
Confirms the split rule: an interleaving non-edit step (here the folded Read run) breaks the consecutive-same-file edit grouping into two separate edit cards. Same-file edits with nothing between them collapse into one "# edits" card.
STATUS INDICATOR (live tick reuse): the bundled edits card carries ONE header status indicator that reuses the existing per-step success tick, driven by the latest edit''s state:
- edit in flight -> spinner
- edit completed -> success check (the current green tick)
- next edit starts -> back to spinner
- ...repeat, settling on check when the final edit in the run completes (or the error glyph if one fails).
So the collapsed card''s indicator animates spinner<->check as the run grows, rather than showing a static tick. Each individual edit keeps its own tick in the expanded list (unchanged); this is the aggregate indicator on the holder header/ticker. Mirror the same treatment for the existing "# steps" activity card if it doesn''t already do this.
DONE 2026-06-09 (commit). coalesceEditRuns folds consecutive same-file edits into one ''# edits'' ClideHolderCard; aggregate live status via new ClideStatusIndicator (running/success/error) + ClideSpinner (logo-mark, 3D Y rotation, reduced-motion aware), shared with the activity card. Per user: spinner is a self-contained component (not built on ConversationCard''s mark) with an AnimatedSwitcher seam for a richer spinnercheck transition later. Tests: activity_cluster_test (coalesce), conversation_view_test (edits card), clide_status_indicator_test.', 'done', 'medium', NULL, NULL, NULL, '2026-06-09 15:43:58', '2026-06-09 16:34:46', NULL, '7d71f2e8bc6632dcc096d91d748d0cde', 1) ON CONFLICT(id) DO UPDATE SET type=excluded.type, parent_id=excluded.parent_id, title=excluded.title, description=excluded.description, status=excluded.status, priority=excluded.priority, assigned_to=excluded.assigned_to, team=excluded.team, decision_ref=excluded.decision_ref, updated_at=excluded.updated_at, deleted_at=excluded.deleted_at, hash=excluded.hash, canonical_version=excluded.canonical_version WHERE excluded.updated_at > tickets.updated_at OR (excluded.updated_at = tickets.updated_at AND excluded.hash > tickets.hash);