record the SSH-remote footprint decision menu in Q-23 (T-330)
The Phase-0 spike's core pick — no-install ssh-exec vs auto-pushed remote agent — is the user's call (they've said they don't want to manage remote installs; the agent model buys inotify + a stateful backend). Q-23 now carries the 2026-06-12 triage block with both options, the agent-model sub-questions, the remote-tool-contract D-record need, and the latency-probe evidence gap (no sshd reachable from the dev box). T-330 is annotated blocked-on-user; the model-independent backbone phases proceed meanwhile. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -4147,3 +4147,10 @@ DECSTR (`CSI ! p`, soft reset) is a separate, smaller follow-up — same interme
|
||||
|
||||
Done when: claude/vim cursor-shape changes (insert vs normal mode) render as bar vs block in the terminal pane.', NULL, '2026-06-12 00:52:40', '2026-06-12 00:52:40', '2026-06-12 00:52:40', NULL, 'fd38b932757c81de62d693d72b883448', 2) ON CONFLICT(hash) DO NOTHING;
|
||||
INSERT INTO ticket_history (ticket_record_id, field, old_value, new_value, changed_by, changed_at, created_at, updated_at, deleted_at, hash, canonical_version) VALUES ('06FB3DKQQJ583944DG8561VQ3G', 'status', 'backlog', 'done', NULL, '2026-06-12 01:04:52', '2026-06-12 01:04:52', '2026-06-12 01:04:52', NULL, '66a692e143b6a4be1b4845825e9e16ad', 2) ON CONFLICT(hash) DO NOTHING;
|
||||
INSERT INTO ticket_history (ticket_record_id, field, old_value, new_value, changed_by, changed_at, created_at, updated_at, deleted_at, hash, canonical_version) VALUES ('06FB3DJZDDZ00BSA04B660RS7M', 'description', 'GATE for the whole epic — nothing else starts until this lands. Turn Q-23 into D-records and pick the footprint model with evidence. Decide between: (1) No-install ssh-exec (zero remote footprint) — stock ssh: ssh -tt PTYs for terminal/Claude, multiplexed ControlMaster command channels for git/pql/file ops; nothing clide-specific on the remote; watching degrades to polling; no stateful remote process. (2) Auto-pushed self-managed agent (VS Code Remote model) — clide auto-deploys + version-checks one self-contained binary on connect (a headless UI-less deployment of the existing subsystem library: lib/src/daemon, git, pql, files, pty, ipc/server.dart — hosting the same DaemonDispatcher + IpcServer); gains native inotify watching + stateful backend. MUST answer the user''s agent-model sub-questions: is it a proxy/backend? cleanup/GC on disconnect/version-bump/repo-removal? placement (per-repo .clide/agent vs per-host ~/.clide/agent vs shared — per-host shared likely)? multi-client sharing (two local clides / two users — share one agent or one each? IpcServer is already multi-connection, D-72)? version skew (version encoded in binary name, e.g. clide-agent-<ver>, so versions coexist)? Also measure ControlMaster per-command latency for the ssh-exec model. Also decide the remote-tool contract: what must exist remotely (git/pql/claude/shell), whether pql is hard-required or degrades, and how a preflight surfaces what is missing. Include the D-56 reconciliation: ''single process'' is scoped per-host-per-workspace; a headless remote deployment of the subsystem library does not violate the no-second-local-process rule. Artifacts: Q-23 -> Resolved; new D-records for footprint model + D-56 framing, ssh:// URI scheme, remote auth (system ssh, v1, Windows deferred), remote-tool contract, session identity keyed on (host, repo) amending D-41/D-77.', 'GATE for the whole epic — nothing else starts until this lands. Turn Q-23 into D-records and pick the footprint model with evidence. Decide between: (1) No-install ssh-exec (zero remote footprint) — stock ssh: ssh -tt PTYs for terminal/Claude, multiplexed ControlMaster command channels for git/pql/file ops; nothing clide-specific on the remote; watching degrades to polling; no stateful remote process. (2) Auto-pushed self-managed agent (VS Code Remote model) — clide auto-deploys + version-checks one self-contained binary on connect (a headless UI-less deployment of the existing subsystem library: lib/src/daemon, git, pql, files, pty, ipc/server.dart — hosting the same DaemonDispatcher + IpcServer); gains native inotify watching + stateful backend. MUST answer the user''s agent-model sub-questions: is it a proxy/backend? cleanup/GC on disconnect/version-bump/repo-removal? placement (per-repo .clide/agent vs per-host ~/.clide/agent vs shared — per-host shared likely)? multi-client sharing (two local clides / two users — share one agent or one each? IpcServer is already multi-connection, D-72)? version skew (version encoded in binary name, e.g. clide-agent-<ver>, so versions coexist)? Also measure ControlMaster per-command latency for the ssh-exec model. Also decide the remote-tool contract: what must exist remotely (git/pql/claude/shell), whether pql is hard-required or degrades, and how a preflight surfaces what is missing. Include the D-56 reconciliation: ''single process'' is scoped per-host-per-workspace; a headless remote deployment of the subsystem library does not violate the no-second-local-process rule. Artifacts: Q-23 -> Resolved; new D-records for footprint model + D-56 framing, ssh:// URI scheme, remote auth (system ssh, v1, Windows deferred), remote-tool contract, session identity keyed on (host, repo) amending D-41/D-77.
|
||||
|
||||
2026-06-12 status: BLOCKED ON USER — the footprint pick (no-install ssh-exec vs auto-pushed agent) is a user decision (the user explicitly does not want to manage remote installs, but the agent model buys inotify + a stateful backend). The decision menu + agent sub-questions are written up in Q-23''s 2026-06-12 triage block; resolve there, then convert to D-records per this ticket''s artifact list.
|
||||
|
||||
Also environment-blocked: the ControlMaster latency probe needs a reachable sshd; the dev box has none. Run the probe against a real remote host during the decision session.
|
||||
|
||||
Not actually gating everything: the model-independent backbone is proceeding — Phase 1 (T-331, DaemonTransport seam) is done; the model-independent parts of Phase 2 (T-332: WorkspaceRef, ssh:// parsing, RecentProject host fields) don''t need the footprint pick either. T-336 (execution layer) and Phases 3-5 stay gated.', NULL, '2026-06-12 01:05:38', '2026-06-12 01:05:38', '2026-06-12 01:05:38', NULL, '06d89d9d6456a6263a30f246ac165f0e', 2) ON CONFLICT(hash) DO NOTHING;
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -4430,3 +4430,10 @@ DECSTR (`CSI ! p`, soft reset) is a separate, smaller follow-up — same interme
|
||||
|
||||
Done when: claude/vim cursor-shape changes (insert vs normal mode) render as bar vs block in the terminal pane.', 'backlog', 'low', NULL, NULL, NULL, '2026-06-12 00:52:25', '2026-06-12 00:52:40', NULL, '5c07c49f5ad28c005a77ba26434e66d7', 2) ON CONFLICT(record_id) DO UPDATE SET type=excluded.type, parent_record_id=excluded.parent_record_id, title=excluded.title, description=excluded.description, status=excluded.status, priority=excluded.priority, assigned_to=excluded.assigned_to, team=excluded.team, decision_ref=excluded.decision_ref, updated_at=excluded.updated_at, deleted_at=excluded.deleted_at, hash=excluded.hash, canonical_version=excluded.canonical_version WHERE excluded.updated_at > tickets.updated_at OR (excluded.updated_at = tickets.updated_at AND excluded.hash > tickets.hash);
|
||||
INSERT INTO tickets (record_id, type, parent_record_id, title, description, status, priority, assigned_to, team, decision_ref, created_at, updated_at, deleted_at, hash, canonical_version) VALUES ('06FB3DKQQJ583944DG8561VQ3G', 'story', '06FB3DHCTP001YCHFP39XER0ZM', 'Phase 1 — backend transport seam (DaemonTransport, prove locally)', 'Model-independent backbone. Make the local app talk to its backend through a DaemonTransport abstraction with ZERO behavior change, so a remote transport can slot in later. New lib/src/ipc/transport.dart: DaemonTransport interface + LocalTransport (wraps today''s unix-socket connect). DaemonClient takes a transport instead of a hard-coded socket path; its reconnect loop generalizes to ''re-establish via transport''. lib/main.dart: swapIpcServer (~:119) becomes swapBackend — local binds the in-process IpcServer as today; seam ready for a remote branch. Wire protocol unchanged — JSON-lines IpcRequest/IpcResponse/IpcEvent (envelope.dart) already serialize over IPC; event stream, tail --events, events --since cursor-pull ride the same stream untouched. Verify: make test-core (IPC) + testmode skill — local path behaves identically through the seam, no regression. Depends on Phase 0 (T-330).', 'done', 'high', NULL, NULL, NULL, '2026-06-10 13:26:25', '2026-06-12 01:04:52', NULL, 'c36521dfda73828837c32d44eb2f6a4e', 2) ON CONFLICT(record_id) DO UPDATE SET type=excluded.type, parent_record_id=excluded.parent_record_id, title=excluded.title, description=excluded.description, status=excluded.status, priority=excluded.priority, assigned_to=excluded.assigned_to, team=excluded.team, decision_ref=excluded.decision_ref, updated_at=excluded.updated_at, deleted_at=excluded.deleted_at, hash=excluded.hash, canonical_version=excluded.canonical_version WHERE excluded.updated_at > tickets.updated_at OR (excluded.updated_at = tickets.updated_at AND excluded.hash > tickets.hash);
|
||||
INSERT INTO tickets (record_id, type, parent_record_id, title, description, status, priority, assigned_to, team, decision_ref, created_at, updated_at, deleted_at, hash, canonical_version) VALUES ('06FB3DJZDDZ00BSA04B660RS7M', 'story', '06FB3DHCTP001YCHFP39XER0ZM', 'Phase 0 — governance spike: pick remote-execution footprint model (resolve Q-23)', 'GATE for the whole epic — nothing else starts until this lands. Turn Q-23 into D-records and pick the footprint model with evidence. Decide between: (1) No-install ssh-exec (zero remote footprint) — stock ssh: ssh -tt PTYs for terminal/Claude, multiplexed ControlMaster command channels for git/pql/file ops; nothing clide-specific on the remote; watching degrades to polling; no stateful remote process. (2) Auto-pushed self-managed agent (VS Code Remote model) — clide auto-deploys + version-checks one self-contained binary on connect (a headless UI-less deployment of the existing subsystem library: lib/src/daemon, git, pql, files, pty, ipc/server.dart — hosting the same DaemonDispatcher + IpcServer); gains native inotify watching + stateful backend. MUST answer the user''s agent-model sub-questions: is it a proxy/backend? cleanup/GC on disconnect/version-bump/repo-removal? placement (per-repo .clide/agent vs per-host ~/.clide/agent vs shared — per-host shared likely)? multi-client sharing (two local clides / two users — share one agent or one each? IpcServer is already multi-connection, D-72)? version skew (version encoded in binary name, e.g. clide-agent-<ver>, so versions coexist)? Also measure ControlMaster per-command latency for the ssh-exec model. Also decide the remote-tool contract: what must exist remotely (git/pql/claude/shell), whether pql is hard-required or degrades, and how a preflight surfaces what is missing. Include the D-56 reconciliation: ''single process'' is scoped per-host-per-workspace; a headless remote deployment of the subsystem library does not violate the no-second-local-process rule. Artifacts: Q-23 -> Resolved; new D-records for footprint model + D-56 framing, ssh:// URI scheme, remote auth (system ssh, v1, Windows deferred), remote-tool contract, session identity keyed on (host, repo) amending D-41/D-77.
|
||||
|
||||
2026-06-12 status: BLOCKED ON USER — the footprint pick (no-install ssh-exec vs auto-pushed agent) is a user decision (the user explicitly does not want to manage remote installs, but the agent model buys inotify + a stateful backend). The decision menu + agent sub-questions are written up in Q-23''s 2026-06-12 triage block; resolve there, then convert to D-records per this ticket''s artifact list.
|
||||
|
||||
Also environment-blocked: the ControlMaster latency probe needs a reachable sshd; the dev box has none. Run the probe against a real remote host during the decision session.
|
||||
|
||||
Not actually gating everything: the model-independent backbone is proceeding — Phase 1 (T-331, DaemonTransport seam) is done; the model-independent parts of Phase 2 (T-332: WorkspaceRef, ssh:// parsing, RecentProject host fields) don''t need the footprint pick either. T-336 (execution layer) and Phases 3-5 stay gated.', 'backlog', 'high', NULL, NULL, NULL, '2026-06-10 13:26:19', '2026-06-12 01:05:38', NULL, '8cdf49e49dfbc07f6bb2ca2532cc65fc', 2) ON CONFLICT(record_id) DO UPDATE SET type=excluded.type, parent_record_id=excluded.parent_record_id, title=excluded.title, description=excluded.description, status=excluded.status, priority=excluded.priority, assigned_to=excluded.assigned_to, team=excluded.team, decision_ref=excluded.decision_ref, updated_at=excluded.updated_at, deleted_at=excluded.deleted_at, hash=excluded.hash, canonical_version=excluded.canonical_version WHERE excluded.updated_at > tickets.updated_at OR (excluded.updated_at = tickets.updated_at AND excluded.hash > tickets.hash);
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -63,6 +63,11 @@ ticket persistence.
|
||||
- **Status:** Open
|
||||
- **Question:** Clide today assumes the workspace, the daemon, and the Flutter UI all run on the same machine. A growing class of users edits on remote systems (build servers, GPU boxes, cloud dev environments). What's the architecture for "open repo on host-B from UI on host-A"? Two shapes: (A) daemon-on-remote — clide's Dart daemon runs on the remote; the app talks to it over an SSH-tunnelled unix socket or a dedicated TCP socket (mTLS?), pty/process/filesystem work stays server-side; local app is pure UI. (B) filesystem-mounted — remote mounted via sshfs/9p/rclone, daemon runs locally against the mount; simpler but every fs op + git call crosses the network, and PTYs get complicated (local shell on remote filesystem? ssh-exec per command?). (A) matches VS Code Remote / JetBrains Gateway; (B) matches nothing load-bearing. Sub-questions either way: auth (ssh-agent? per-project keys? OIDC?), tmux / Claude session persistence semantics (does primary-per-repo re-key on host + repo?), multi-host identity in `.pql/pql.db`, latency tolerance for the event stream, re-sync on disconnect.
|
||||
- **Context:** Surfaced 2026-04-22 during Tier-1 planning. Not a Tier 1 concern — terminal + Claude panes land local-first — but the daemon/IPC seam decisions (notably `D-5` and `D-6`) constrain the future answer. Worth scoping before Tier 6 (extension API) so third-party extensions don't accrue assumptions the remote path would have to unwind. The 2026-06-11 Fable review (fable-ous.md Part IV, Tier 3 #14) reframed the differentiator and ranked T-329 as undersold: the agent runs on the buildbox while permission prompts render natively local — VS Code Remote moves the *editor*; nobody remotes the *agent control channel*. That framing favours shape (A).
|
||||
- **Triage (2026-06-12):** Shape (A) is effectively settled (T-329 epic locked: execution remote, UI + clipboard local, system ssh auth for v1). The model-independent backbone is proceeding: Phase 1 (T-331, `DaemonTransport` seam) landed. What remains open is the **footprint model** — the user decision T-330 gates on:
|
||||
1. **No-install ssh-exec** — zero remote footprint; stock `ssh -tt` PTYs + ControlMaster command channels; watching degrades to polling; heavier subsystem surface locally.
|
||||
2. **Auto-pushed self-managed agent** (VS Code Remote model) — clide deploys/version-checks a headless agent binary on connect; native inotify + stateful backend; but installs clide components on the remote, which the user has said they don't want to manage.
|
||||
|
||||
If (2), the agent sub-questions need answers before T-336 expands: placement (per-host `~/.clide/agent` likely), GC on disconnect/version-bump/repo-removal, multi-client sharing (IpcServer is already multi-connection, D-72), version skew (version-named binaries coexist). Either way the **remote-tool contract** needs a D-record: what must exist remotely (git/shell at minimum), whether pql is hard-required or degrades, and how a connect-preflight surfaces gaps. Evidence gap: the ControlMaster per-command latency probe (T-330) needs a reachable sshd — none in the dev environment; run it against a real remote before deciding if latency is the deciding factor.
|
||||
- **Source:** 2026-04-22 planning (user-raised).
|
||||
|
||||
### Q-22: Ticket persistence strategy
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user