Files
settled-reach/wiki/star-systems/GJ-682/index.md
T
jpmschweitzerandClaude Opus 4.6 199770ee41 data(wiki): add Bodies/Population rows + economic profiles to 301 systems (#790, #781)
Adds Bodies and Population rows to System Profile tables across all 301
star-system wiki pages. Adds Industries, Exports, and Imports economic
profile rows derived from systems.db economic_base + body type + topology.
Includes 9 body/station name changes from cultural diversity remediation.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-04-06 16:03:56 +02:00

6.6 KiB

Taishan

GJ 682 | M-type | east_reach


System Profile

Star M5 · 16.6 ly
Bodies 0 habitable · 2 inhabited
Gates 3 aperture · junction
Settlement wave_4
Industries fusion_fuel, metallic_ore, financial_services, insurance, legal_services, rare_minerals, chemical_feedstock
Exports financial_services, legal_services, rare_minerals
Imports processed_food, electronics, consumer_goods, medical_goods, refined_metals, chemicals
Population

Supply Dependency

Taishan's three gates connect the inner east corridor to two significant branches: one running coreward to Changwon (GJ 860B), one reaching toward GJ 784 deeper into the mid-reach, and one opening toward GJ 434. The system has grown an industrial economy around the intersection — not the specialized precision manufacturing of Matsue (GJ 687) at the preceding corridor node, but the heavier, less refined work that junction throughput generates: cargo repackaging, transit equipment repair, structural components for habitat expansion, and the bulk processing of materials that arrive in one form and need to leave in another.

Wave_4 settlement at a three-gate junction means Taishan developed after the corridor's commercial logic was already established — the junction value was known before the settlement was built, and the founding design reflects that. The system was invested in deliberately rather than accumulated organically. Its settlement pattern reflects deliberate investment — the junction value was identified before the founding, and the infrastructure was built to meet a projected role.

Faction Notes

Taishan was settled under a Syndic development charter by a Chinese-heritage industrial consortium that chose the name after the sacred mountain in Shandong province — aspirational naming typical of wave_4 corporate foundations that wanted cultural gravitas without the specificity of a place-transplant. The founding consortium has since merged, been acquired, and dissolved across four commercial generations; its successor entity retains the Taishan Industrial designation as a legal continuity measure.

Current governance is a combined corporate-residential council, with corporate seats weighted toward the major industrial operators and residential seats elected by the general population. The Yongli Combine (headquartered at Haodu, GJ 566A) has a production affiliate here, representing one of the major industrial seats. The founding consortium's successor entity holds two others. Residential representation is genuine but the council structure means major decisions require corporate seat concurrence.

The Lattice Commission's presence reflects Taishan's junction status: a substantial customs and compliance office staffed with experienced personnel who handle freight inspection for the three-gate traffic volume. Gate Corporation operates a full junction maintenance team.

Silence Topic

What the corporate council does not discuss publicly: the environmental remediation liability.

One of the earlier industrial operations at Taishan — a bulk processing facility that operated for approximately sixty years before being shut down and transferred — left subsurface contamination in the habitat zone adjacent to the original development footprint. The contamination is documented in internal corporate records. A remediation assessment was commissioned by the Syndic successor entity eighteen years ago. The assessment recommended action. The action has not been taken, because the corporate seat holders cannot agree on proportional liability for a facility that changed ownership three times before it was shut down. The residential council has not been shown the assessment.

Narrative Hook

A remediation assessment for the contaminated subsurface zone beneath Taishan's original settlement district was completed eighteen years ago; the corporate council members who commissioned it have not shared it with the residential council and have not agreed among themselves on who pays.

Calibration Note

wave_4 at hop 5 for a three-gate junction is slightly late — most hub and junction systems at this hop distance were developed in wave_3. The explanation is corridor-specific: the gate path through Taishan was rationalized in wave_4 as part of the commercial expansion push that also settled GJ 566A (Haodu) as a hub. Before that rationalization, GJ 682's gate value was not obvious from the prior topology. The Chinese founding-heritage naming convention is corridor-consistent; the corporate founding structure is consistent with wave_4 east_reach settlement patterns.

Celestial Bodies

Orbit ID Name Type Inhabited Pop Mass Gravity Year (d) Day (h) Atmo Biome Hydro Economy Settlement Industrial
1 GJ682b planet no terrestrial 0.27g 3 81.6 none barren
2 GJ682c Taishan planet yes 280K terrestrial 0.78g 11 259.2 standard temperate_terminator liquid_water manufacturing urban_concentrated heavy_processing
3 GJ682-belt asteroid_belt no
4 GJ682d planet no terrestrial 0.41g 72 21.4 trace frozen
5 GJ682e gas_giant no 290 13.6 gas_giant
↳ 5.1 GJ682e-m1 moon no dwarf 0.10g 4 105.6 frozen
6 GJ682f planet no terrestrial 0.33g 880 28.2 trace frozen ice
7 GJ682g planet no terrestrial 0.25g 2500 36.4 trace frozen ice
8 GJ682h planet no dwarf 0.11g 5800 23.8 none frozen ice
9 GJ682-oort oort_cloud no

Stations & Facilities

ID Name Type Orbits Population Economy Governance Docking Gate Districts
GJ682-oort-S1 Taishan Horizon horizon GJ682-oort 1K transit major yes 1

Topology

  • Hop Distance from Gateway: 5
  • Adjacent Systems: GJ 784, GJ 434, GJ 860B