Adds Bodies and Population rows to System Profile tables across all 301 star-system wiki pages. Adds Industries, Exports, and Imports economic profile rows derived from systems.db economic_base + body type + topology. Includes 9 body/station name changes from cultural diversity remediation. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
6.3 KiB
Athabasca
GJ 1289 | M-type | north_reach
System Profile
| Star | k · 26.5 ly |
| Bodies | 1 habitable · 3 inhabited |
| Gates | 3 aperture · junction |
| Settlement | wave_4 |
| Industries | fusion_fuel, metallic_ore, financial_services, insurance, legal_services |
| Exports | financial_services, legal_services |
| Imports | processed_food, electronics, consumer_goods, medical_goods, refined_metals, chemicals |
| Population | — |
Supply Dependency
Athabasca arrived late and built fast. The system's wave_4 founding was driven by administrative expansion pressure: the Assembly's north_reach regional structure had been administered from Fremantle for three centuries, and the corridor's outer systems had grown numerous enough that a second administrative hub was no longer optional. Athabasca was settled as a regional outpost, which is what it still is — its economy runs on governance services, transit coordination, and the support infrastructure that Assembly field presence requires. It does not grow food for export or mine anything of consequence. It processes paperwork and moves people between systems.
The system's supply position is dependent inward: personnel, equipment, and institutional resources flow from Fremantle and Wolf 359. What flows outward is administrative continuity — filing confirmations, compliance audits, and the Assembly's claim to ongoing jurisdiction over systems that increasingly regard that claim as a formality. Athabasca is the last system on this branch where that claim has operational teeth.
Faction Notes
The Assembly outpost at Athabasca is small, well-staffed relative to other outer systems, and understaffed relative to what the regional case load actually requires. The field officers here are experienced; this posting selects for people who can work without institutional backup and who are comfortable with the specific ambiguity of an authority gradient that drops off sharply one hop outward. The outpost director's operational authority technically extends several hops further north. In practice, the systems beyond Athabasca make local decisions and report them afterward, if at all.
Athabasca's Canadian-heritage character is most visible in its governance culture: committee processes, documented dissent, the institutional habit of achieving consensus before action. The Assembly outpost fits this environment well enough that it is sometimes difficult to tell where local governance ends and Assembly administration begins. This suits both parties.
Silence Topic
What the Assembly's Athabasca outpost does not discuss formally is the compliance picture for the systems it is nominally responsible for beyond hop 6. The outpost files regular status reports to the regional administration at Fremantle. Those reports use language carefully chosen to describe selective compliance as ongoing engagement. The field officers know the difference. The regional administration chooses not to press. This is not corruption — it is an institutional accommodation to a reality that the Assembly's policy framework has not caught up with.
Narrative Hook
Every Assembly field officer posted here eventually writes a private memo concluding that Athabasca is the edge of actual jurisdiction; none of them have officially filed that conclusion, and the drawer of unsubmitted memos grows thicker every year.
Calibration Note
wave_4 at hop_distance: 5 for a junction system is notable — later founding than might be expected for a 3-aperture node this close to the core. The settlement delay reflects deliberate administrative planning rather than organic colonization: Athabasca was founded to serve a function, not because settlers followed economic opportunity here. This makes it more institutionally coherent than wave_4 systems typically are, but also more fragile — its purpose is defined externally, and if the Assembly's regional administrative structure were ever to contract, Athabasca's reason for existing would contract with it.
Celestial Bodies
| Orbit | ID | Name | Type | Inhabited | Pop | Mass | Gravity | Year (d) | Day (h) | Atmo | Biome | Hydro | Economy | Settlement | Industrial |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GJ1289b |
— | planet | no | — | terrestrial | 0.32g | 15 | 360.0 | none | barren | none | — | — | — |
| 2 | GJ1289c |
Lacombe | planet | yes | 200M | terrestrial | 0.88g | 40 | 960.0 | breathable | temperate-cool | moderate | coordination | urban | — |
| ↳ 2.1 | GJ1289c-1 |
— | moon | no | — | dwarf | 0.05g | 6 | 144.0 | none | barren | none | — | — | — |
| 3 | GJ1289d |
— | planet | no | — | terrestrial | 0.40g | 90 | 16.0 | thin | frozen | ice | — | — | — |
| 4 | GJ1289e |
— | planet | no | — | terrestrial | 0.32g | 250 | 16.0 | none | frozen | ice | — | — | — |
| 5 | GJ1289f |
— | planet | no | — | terrestrial | 0.25g | 600 | 15.0 | none | frozen | ice | — | — | — |
| 6 | GJ1289g |
— | gas_giant | no | — | gas_giant | — | 1600 | 11.0 | dense | — | — | — | — | — |
| ↳ 6.1 | GJ1289g-1 |
— | moon | no | — | dwarf | 0.06g | 5 | 120.0 | none | barren | none | — | — | — |
| ↳ 6.2 | GJ1289g-2 |
— | moon | no | — | dwarf | 0.04g | 12 | 288.0 | none | frozen | ice | — | — | — |
| 7 | GJ1289h |
— | planet | no | — | dwarf | 0.11g | 4800 | 22.0 | none | frozen | ice | — | — | — |
| 8 | GJ1289-belt |
— | asteroid_belt | no | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 9 | GJ1289-oort |
— | oort_cloud | no | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Stations & Facilities
| ID | Name | Type | Orbits | Population | Economy | Governance | Docking | Gate | Districts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GJ1289-oort-S1 |
Grimshaw | horizon | GJ1289-oort |
1K | transit | — | major | yes | 1 |
GJ1289c-S1 |
Wainwright | commercial | GJ1289c |
12M | coordination | — | major | no | 1 |
Topology
- Hop Distance from Gateway: 5
- Adjacent Systems: GJ 3988, GJ 273, GJ 680