# Sprint 37: Sweep — Copy Tasks **Goal:** Spring-clean accumulated debt: asset pipeline discipline, PROTOCOL_VERSION removal, D-167/D-032 dead-code purge, New Game regression fix, copy wiki residue, bookmark save-state, and generator quality patches. **Branch:** `sprint-37/copy` **Agents:** Mellanie (author), Paula (narrative), Miri (consistency) ## New Tickets | # | Title | Priority | Blocked by | |---|-------|----------|------------| | #876 | decide(content): Commission formal name — canonical long-form designation (Q-095) | medium | — | | #865 | Purge remaining v0.1 Sova/Van Maanen's residue from wiki | medium | — | | #861 | Author 112 brand corp wiki stubs to three-layer narrative depth | medium | — | Use `tooling/db/ticket show ` for full details. ## Key Decisions - `decisions/questions.md` — Q-095 (Commission formal name — Concord Commission vs. Lattice Commission) - `decisions/content.md` — D-128 (culture implicit in starting location), D-122 (all NPCs generated) - `decisions/economics.md` — D-189 (brand layer architecture — 8 categories), D-185 (brands are not commodities) ## Open Questions to Resolve Early - **Q-095: Commission formal name** — Drift between "Concord Commission" and "Lattice Commission" blocks institutional POI signage and tractus fee legal text. Jeroen picks the long-form name; Mellanie/Paula codify everywhere. Resolve in the first session of the sprint before #865 touches faction files. ## Notes **#876 — Commission formal name decision (Q-095)** - One-conversation resolution. The two drifted names appear in: faction wiki pages, tractus fee descriptions, legal-text authoring guide examples, and institution templates. - Deliverable: a confirmed D-record (claim an ID with `tooling/db/decision claim D content "Commission formal name"` before writing). Update `decisions/questions.md` to mark Q-095 resolved with the D-record reference. - Do this first — #865 will touch faction files and should use the canonical name. **#865 — Purge v0.1 Sova/Van Maanen's residue from wiki** - Start by running `grep -rln 'v0\.1\|Sova Transit\|Van Maanen\|Kael Davan\|Sera Venn\|Nils Davan\|the-ring' wiki/` to scope the full hit list. - Confirm three decision points with Jeroen before bulk editing: 1. Sova/Transit tree under `wiki/star-systems/GJ-35/sova/` — delete outright, or reparent/retag as a legitimate Vuurkloof station? 2. Example references in authoring guides/templates — keep as illustrative voice examples, or replace with galactic-scope alternatives? 3. Decision/lore files citing Kael/Sera/etc. as canonical — rewrite to generic, or delete those sections? - This is judgment-heavy cleanup, not a mechanical find/replace. Confirm the decision points first; do the bulk editing after. - Resolve Q-095 (#876) before touching faction files so the correct Commission name is used throughout. **#861 — Author 112 brand corp wiki stubs to three-layer narrative depth** - Sprint 36 PR #133 shipped 112 new corp wiki pages in `wiki/corporations/` as 24-line frontmatter-only placeholders. They need authoring to the canonical three-layer standard. - Reference template: Calloway, Thrds, VGV, Thalassa stubs (95–125 lines each). Three layers: (1) public identity, (2) actual operation, (3) one concealed fact. - DoD per page: ≥95 lines, all three layers present, cross-refs populated, corridor/founding-system specificity (not generic boilerplate). - This is a full sprint's worth of work for the team. Do not attempt to cram into a single session — divide by corridor or category across Mellanie/Paula/Miri and review as you go. - Paula reviews narrative as authoring progresses. Miri checks cross-ref consistency. ## Dependency Chain ``` #876 (Q-095 Commission name) → #865 (wiki residue purge touches faction files) #861 → standalone, parallel to both above ``` ## PR Workflow ```bash tea pr create --repo jpmschweitzer/settled-reach --login schweitz \ --title "content(wiki): sprint 37 — brand corp stubs, wiki residue purge, Commission name" \ --description "body" \ --base main --head sprint-37/copy ```