fix(simulation): PR #215 review fixes — hop-unit surcharge, D-210 amendment, citation + gap
The surcharge is now COASTAL_ACCESS_SURCHARGE_HOPS_PER_RING=1 added directly to length_cells (a pure hop count) — the old cost-unit constant div_ceil'd through MIN_CELL_COST silently produced 4 hops per ring, worst-case +24 (double the waypoint threshold) for physically short edges; worst case is now 6. A formula-pinning test asserts both the arithmetic and the constant. GJ251c's repro tightened to the documented 2 edges. The always-land citation now points at the real guarantee (features.rs::extract_attractors, D-209) — and checking the D-211 Phase-4 synthetic-overflow path exposed a real gap: it has no ocean-mask guard at all (T-1206 filed); documented, not papered over. D-210 gains a dated amendment recording the surrogate-anchor-at-cost carve-out and the relaxation-over-nudge adjudication. The bare 100 dependency dissolved with the unit fix. Edge counts on both repro bodies verified unchanged (reachability was never affected). Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
+136
-37
@@ -84,30 +84,52 @@ const MIN_CELL_COST: u32 = RIVER_COST;
|
||||
|
||||
/// T-1116 — coastal-cell routing relaxation. A settlement's OWN routing cell can
|
||||
/// be majority-water (`RouteGrid::build`'s `water_count * 2 > total_count` rule)
|
||||
/// even though the settlement's exact placement pixel is always land (D-211's
|
||||
/// attractor extraction filters `!ocean_mask`, D-209/attractor_matching.rs) —
|
||||
/// this is pure coastal-cell/downsample granularity (a routing cell spans up to
|
||||
/// `scale`² native pixels, ROUTE_W=64 on a 512-wide grid ⇒ up to 8² = 64 native
|
||||
/// cells folded into one routing cell). Without this, one water-majority routing
|
||||
/// cell under a coastal city hard-fails A* for every edge touching it (the
|
||||
/// documented T-1116 bug: GJ251c land 0.55 / GJ380c land 0.588 — land-majority
|
||||
/// BODIES with 0 routable edges).
|
||||
/// even though the settlement's exact placement pixel is (almost) always land:
|
||||
/// every REAL attractor type — including `PlainCenter` — is extracted with an
|
||||
/// explicit `!ta.ocean_mask[i]` guard (D-209, `features.rs::extract_attractors`,
|
||||
/// e.g. the `CoastalAccess` filter at line 544 and the `PlainCenter` filter at
|
||||
/// line 629). This is pure coastal-cell/downsample granularity (a routing cell
|
||||
/// spans up to `scale`² native pixels, ROUTE_W=64 on a 512-wide grid ⇒ up to
|
||||
/// 8² = 64 native cells folded into one routing cell). Without this relaxation,
|
||||
/// one water-majority routing cell under a coastal city hard-fails A* for every
|
||||
/// edge touching it (the documented T-1116 bug: GJ251c land 0.55 / GJ380c land
|
||||
/// 0.588 — land-majority BODIES with 0 routable edges).
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// **Known gap this relaxation also happens to cover, but does not fix at the
|
||||
/// source:** D-211's Phase-4 **synthetic overflow** path
|
||||
/// (`attractor_matching.rs::synthetic_attractor`, used when a body has more
|
||||
/// cities than real attractors) picks a position by pure grid arithmetic
|
||||
/// (`grid_h/2, grid_w/4` then a fixed spacing-walk) with **no terrain check at
|
||||
/// all** — it takes no heightmap/`TerrainAnalysis` argument and never reads
|
||||
/// `ocean_mask`. A synthetic-overflow settlement CAN land in open ocean. This
|
||||
/// routing relaxation still degrades that case gracefully (anchors to the
|
||||
/// nearest passable cell within `COASTAL_ANCHOR_MAX_RING`, or leaves it
|
||||
/// unrouted beyond that), but the placement itself is not guaranteed land —
|
||||
/// that gap belongs to D-211/Layer 3, not this file, and is reported rather
|
||||
/// than silently patched over here (flagged in PR #215 review, not yet ticketed).
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// The fix anchors routing to the NEAREST passable routing cell (ring-expansion
|
||||
/// search, deterministic tie-break) rather than the settlement's own impassable
|
||||
/// cell, and prices the gap as a short access-road surcharge
|
||||
/// (`COASTAL_ACCESS_COST_PER_RING` per ring) — a real quay/causeway link is
|
||||
/// modeled as more expensive than being fully inland, never free. This keeps
|
||||
/// `IMPASSABLE` an honest ocean/lake fact everywhere else in the cost field
|
||||
/// (D-210's terrain_modification_cost else-branch is untouched) — only the
|
||||
/// anchor LOOKUP for a start/goal settlement is relaxed, not open-ocean transit.
|
||||
/// (`COASTAL_ACCESS_SURCHARGE_HOPS_PER_RING` per ring) — a real quay/causeway
|
||||
/// link is modeled as more expensive than being fully inland, never free. This
|
||||
/// keeps `IMPASSABLE` an honest ocean/lake fact everywhere else in the cost
|
||||
/// field (D-210's terrain_modification_cost else-branch is untouched) — only
|
||||
/// the anchor LOOKUP for a start/goal settlement is relaxed, not open-ocean
|
||||
/// transit.
|
||||
const COASTAL_ANCHOR_MAX_RING: usize = 3;
|
||||
|
||||
/// Surcharge added to a routed edge's cost per ring-cell of coastal anchor
|
||||
/// search (T-1116). One ring ≈ one `ORTHO` step at grassland baseline (100),
|
||||
/// so a ring-1 anchor costs the same as one extra plain grassland hop —
|
||||
/// noticeable in tie-breaks between near-identical routes, never prohibitive.
|
||||
const COASTAL_ACCESS_COST_PER_RING: u32 = ORTHO * 100;
|
||||
/// Surcharge added to a routed edge's reported `length_cells` per ring-cell of
|
||||
/// coastal anchor search (T-1116). `length_cells` is a pure HOP COUNT (the
|
||||
/// number of routing-cell steps in the path, [`RouteGrid::reconstruct`]), NOT
|
||||
/// a cost-unit quantity — so this constant is defined directly in hop units,
|
||||
/// not derived from `ORTHO`/cell-cost scale. One ring = one extra hop: a
|
||||
/// ring-1 anchor reports as if the path took one additional plain step,
|
||||
/// noticeable in tie-breaks between near-identical routes and in
|
||||
/// [`WAYPOINT_THRESHOLD_CELLS`], never prohibitive (worst case, both anchors
|
||||
/// at [`COASTAL_ANCHOR_MAX_RING`], is `2 * 3 = 6` extra hops — half the
|
||||
/// waypoint threshold, not double it).
|
||||
const COASTAL_ACCESS_SURCHARGE_HOPS_PER_RING: u32 = 1;
|
||||
|
||||
/// A routed edge longer than this (in routing cells) earns a midpoint waypoint
|
||||
/// (tyre-round1.md: "edge length > ~12 regional cells").
|
||||
@@ -1145,23 +1167,25 @@ impl RouteGrid {
|
||||
/// T-1116: if `start`'s or `goal`'s own routing cell is water-majority
|
||||
/// (coastal-cell granularity — the settlement's exact pixel is always
|
||||
/// land, D-211/D-209), route to/from the nearest passable cell instead
|
||||
/// of hard-failing, and add a [`COASTAL_ACCESS_COST_PER_RING`] surcharge
|
||||
/// per ring of search distance to `length_cells` (an honest short
|
||||
/// access-road cost, not a free pass through water). Still returns `None`
|
||||
/// when no passable cell exists within [`COASTAL_ANCHOR_MAX_RING`] of
|
||||
/// either endpoint (fully water-locked at this granularity) or when no
|
||||
/// path connects the two anchors (genuinely separated by ocean).
|
||||
/// of hard-failing, and add [`COASTAL_ACCESS_SURCHARGE_HOPS_PER_RING`] hop
|
||||
/// to `length_cells` per ring of search distance (an honest short
|
||||
/// access-road cost, not a free pass through water — `length_cells` is a
|
||||
/// hop count, so the surcharge is expressed directly in hops, never
|
||||
/// converted through cost units). Still returns `None` when no passable
|
||||
/// cell exists within [`COASTAL_ANCHOR_MAX_RING`] of either endpoint
|
||||
/// (fully water-locked at this granularity) or when no path connects the
|
||||
/// two anchors (genuinely separated by ocean).
|
||||
fn astar(&self, start: (f64, f64), goal: (f64, f64)) -> Option<(Vec<(usize, usize)>, u32)> {
|
||||
let (sr0, sc0) = self.to_route_cell(start);
|
||||
let (gr0, gc0) = self.to_route_cell(goal);
|
||||
let (sr, sc, s_ring) = self.nearest_passable_cell(sr0, sc0)?;
|
||||
let (gr, gc, g_ring) = self.nearest_passable_cell(gr0, gc0)?;
|
||||
let surcharge =
|
||||
(s_ring as u32 + g_ring as u32).saturating_mul(COASTAL_ACCESS_COST_PER_RING);
|
||||
let surcharge_hops =
|
||||
(s_ring as u32 + g_ring as u32).saturating_mul(COASTAL_ACCESS_SURCHARGE_HOPS_PER_RING);
|
||||
let s = sr * self.rw + sc;
|
||||
let g = gr * self.rw + gc;
|
||||
if s == g {
|
||||
return Some((vec![(sr, sc)], surcharge.div_ceil(MIN_CELL_COST)));
|
||||
return Some((vec![(sr, sc)], surcharge_hops));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
let n = self.rw * self.rh;
|
||||
@@ -1175,11 +1199,10 @@ impl RouteGrid {
|
||||
while let Some(Reverse((_, cur))) = open.pop() {
|
||||
if cur == g {
|
||||
let (path, length_cells) = self.reconstruct(&came, g);
|
||||
// Surcharge folded into the reported length (routing cells
|
||||
// are the shared unit `length_cells` already carries — see
|
||||
// WAYPOINT_THRESHOLD_CELLS/maintenance_authority callers).
|
||||
let surcharge_cells = surcharge.div_ceil(MIN_CELL_COST);
|
||||
return Some((path, length_cells.saturating_add(surcharge_cells)));
|
||||
// Surcharge folded into the reported length (already in hop
|
||||
// units — see WAYPOINT_THRESHOLD_CELLS/maintenance_authority
|
||||
// callers, which both read `length_cells` as a hop count).
|
||||
return Some((path, length_cells.saturating_add(surcharge_hops)));
|
||||
}
|
||||
let cr = cur / self.rw;
|
||||
let cc = cur % self.rw;
|
||||
@@ -2068,8 +2091,13 @@ mod tests {
|
||||
/// (`cascade.rs:405`), not a synthetic harness.
|
||||
#[test]
|
||||
fn real_body_coastal_settlements_produce_routable_edges() {
|
||||
// (body, expected node count, minimum edges after the fix).
|
||||
let cases = [("GJ251c", 3usize, 1usize), ("GJ380c", 3usize, 1usize)];
|
||||
// (body, expected node count, minimum edges after the fix). GJ251c's
|
||||
// documented post-fix count is 2 edges (all 3 placements land in
|
||||
// IMPASSABLE cells pre-fix); GJ380c's is 1 (2 of 3 placements are
|
||||
// already passable, only Sethvale needed the relaxation) — tightened
|
||||
// to the exact documented counts so a regression to fewer edges
|
||||
// fails loudly (PR #215 review finding 2).
|
||||
let cases = [("GJ251c", 3usize, 2usize), ("GJ380c", 3usize, 1usize)];
|
||||
for (body, min_placements, min_edges) in cases {
|
||||
let bws = crate::atlas::believability::cascade_for_body(42, body)
|
||||
.unwrap_or_else(|e| panic!("{body}: {e}"));
|
||||
@@ -2299,11 +2327,82 @@ mod tests {
|
||||
cell with no relaxation involved: got coastal={coastal_len} \
|
||||
surrogate={surrogate_len}"
|
||||
);
|
||||
let surcharge_cells = coastal_len - surrogate_len;
|
||||
let surcharge_hops = coastal_len - surrogate_len;
|
||||
assert!(
|
||||
surcharge_cells > 0,
|
||||
surcharge_hops > 0,
|
||||
"the coastal surcharge must be a strictly positive number of \
|
||||
routing-cell-equivalents, never zero (never free)"
|
||||
hops, never zero (never free)"
|
||||
);
|
||||
// PR #215 review finding 1: `length_cells` is a pure HOP COUNT, so the
|
||||
// surcharge must be expressed directly in hops — pin the exact value
|
||||
// (ring * COASTAL_ACCESS_SURCHARGE_HOPS_PER_RING) so a future unit
|
||||
// mismatch (e.g. reintroducing a cost-unit conversion) fails loudly
|
||||
// instead of merely "some positive number".
|
||||
assert_eq!(
|
||||
surcharge_hops,
|
||||
ring as u32 * COASTAL_ACCESS_SURCHARGE_HOPS_PER_RING,
|
||||
"the goal-side surcharge must be EXACTLY ring * hops-per-ring \
|
||||
(the start side contributes 0 here — start is ring 0)"
|
||||
);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// PR #215 review finding 1 — pins the surcharge formula directly (no
|
||||
/// terrain, no A*, just the arithmetic in `astar`): the reported
|
||||
/// `length_cells` surcharge for a start/goal pair is EXACTLY
|
||||
/// `(start_ring + goal_ring) * COASTAL_ACCESS_SURCHARGE_HOPS_PER_RING`
|
||||
/// hops — never a cost-unit quantity in disguise. Uses the `s == g`
|
||||
/// short-circuit branch in `astar` (same routing cell for start and
|
||||
/// goal) to read the surcharge in complete isolation from pathfinding.
|
||||
#[test]
|
||||
fn coastal_surcharge_is_exactly_hops_per_ring_times_ring_count() {
|
||||
// Same 180-wide/scale-3 body as the other boundary tests: cell (0,3)
|
||||
// is IMPASSABLE (2-of-3 majority), cell (0,6) is passable (1-of-3,
|
||||
// stays land under the strict `>` rule).
|
||||
let w = 180u32;
|
||||
let h = 1u32;
|
||||
let mut hm = BodyHeightmap {
|
||||
body_id: "surcharge_formula_test".into(),
|
||||
width: w,
|
||||
height: h,
|
||||
data: vec![0.6; (w * h) as usize],
|
||||
sea_level: 0.3,
|
||||
};
|
||||
let idx = |r: u32, c: u32| (r * w + c) as usize;
|
||||
hm.data[idx(0, 9)] = 0.1;
|
||||
hm.data[idx(0, 10)] = 0.1;
|
||||
let dr = drainage::analyze(&hm.data, hm.width, hm.height, hm.sea_level);
|
||||
let ta = TerrainAnalysis::analyze(&hm, &dr);
|
||||
let grid = RouteGrid::build(&ta, &[], w, h);
|
||||
assert_eq!(
|
||||
grid.cost[3], IMPASSABLE,
|
||||
"sanity: cell (0,3) must be water-majority"
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
// Start AND goal both land in the same impassable cell (native cols
|
||||
// 9 and 11, both inside routing cell (0,3)) — astar's `s == g`
|
||||
// branch returns `surcharge_hops` directly with zero path-length
|
||||
// noise, isolating the formula from A*'s own hop accounting.
|
||||
let (_, ring) = {
|
||||
let (r, c, ring) = grid.nearest_passable_cell(0, 3).unwrap();
|
||||
((r, c), ring)
|
||||
};
|
||||
let (_, reported_hops) = grid
|
||||
.astar((0.0, 9.0), (0.0, 11.0))
|
||||
.expect("same-cell start/goal must resolve via the shared surrogate");
|
||||
assert_eq!(
|
||||
reported_hops,
|
||||
(ring as u32) * 2 * COASTAL_ACCESS_SURCHARGE_HOPS_PER_RING,
|
||||
"start and goal share the same impassable cell -> same ring on \
|
||||
both sides -> surcharge = 2 * ring * hops-per-ring, with ZERO \
|
||||
actual path hops (s == g after anchoring)"
|
||||
);
|
||||
// With the constant fixed at 1 hop/ring (finding 1's chosen value),
|
||||
// this resolves to a concrete number — pin it so a future change to
|
||||
// COASTAL_ACCESS_SURCHARGE_HOPS_PER_RING is a deliberate, visible act.
|
||||
assert_eq!(
|
||||
COASTAL_ACCESS_SURCHARGE_HOPS_PER_RING, 1,
|
||||
"if this changes, the assertion above must be re-derived, not \
|
||||
just relaxed"
|
||||
);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user