jpmschweitzer/settled-reach
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

chore(skills): pr-review — use Write+printf for comment files, foreground-only tea-comment

Browse Source 
Also adds Q-097 (strip corp "What They Don't Talk About" sections).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
jpmschweitzer
2026-05-03 16:00:16 +02:00
co-authored by Claude Opus 4.6
parent ce520e4977
commit aa7c0812f2
2 changed files with 29 additions and 7 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files
decisions/questions-content.md
+12 -1
View File
@@ -238,4 +238,15 @@ Narrative, NPCs, dialogue, templates, setting, worldbuilding, and storyteller me
---
*25 questions (11 resolved, 2 partially resolved, 12 open). Last updated: 2026-04-21 (Q-095 resolved — D-193 Lattice Commission)*
---
### Q-097: Strip "What They Don't Talk About" from corporation pages
- **Status:** Open
- **Question:** Should we remove "What They Don't Talk About" sections from corporation wiki pages? Currently 116 of 156 corp pages have this section. The argument: cultural silences are a population/system-level phenomenon — people carry them because of where they live, not who employs them. A mining company doesn't develop its own cultural ethos; its workers inherit the system's silences. Corporate secrecy (trade secrets, undisclosed contracts) is just business, not anthropology. Gate Corporation may be an exception as a civilization-scale institution, but Arbour Aggregates and Rush Mining are regional businesses whose people are system-people first.
- **Context:** Pattern originated from Gate Corporation (which plausibly operates at civilization scale) and was applied uniformly to all corp pages during bulk authoring. Now reinforcing itself — reviewers flag its *absence* as a defect (Sprint 38 PR #140 round 1). If left in place, every new corp page will copy the pattern. Counter-argument: some corporate silences *are* distinct from system silences (e.g., a pharmaceutical company's certification history vs. the system's general cultural memory). The question is whether that justifies a dedicated section or whether it belongs inline in Operations/Market Position.
- **Affects:** 116 wiki/corporations/*.md files, corp page template, reviewer expectations
- **Source:** Sprint 38 PR #140 review discussion (2026-05-02)
---
*26 questions (11 resolved, 2 partially resolved, 13 open). Last updated: 2026-05-02 (Q-097 corp silences)*