* docs(specs): restore bootstrap after dev rewrite
* docs(specs): remove runtime inventory snapshot
* docs(specs): reconcile current dev truth
* docs(specs): document scheduled task actions as an owner-attribution source
Owner Attribution covered cookie, bearer-token and internal-loopback
requests. Scheduled task actions are a fourth source and behave
differently: _execute_action passes owner=task.owner off the stored
ScheduledTask row, so no request and no resolved principal are in
flight, and route-level require_user() never runs.
Webhook triggers are the sharp case. They are unauthenticated by
design with the token as the only credential and execute under the
stored task.owner.
Paths cite routes/task/task_routes.py, the canonical location after
the task subpackage move (#6081); routes/task_routes.py on current dev
is the backward-compat shim.
* docs(specs): add chained tasks to the trigger list, refresh dev stamp
Review feedback from RaresKeY on the previous commit.
"Every trigger path" was too broad: success-chained tasks are another
path into _execute_action. Added them with their own citation, and
noted that chaining additionally requires the target task to share
task.owner and rejects cycles, which is stricter than the trigger-side
checks. Softened the lead-in to "these trigger paths".
Line 56 still pointed at routes/task_routes.py for webhook credential
validation. That path is the backward-compat shim on current dev after
the task subpackage move (#6081); repointed to the canonical
routes/task/task_routes.py.
Stamp moved to dev@2a6b09b. Inspection backing that bump was scoped:
every file path cited in this spec was mechanically checked to resolve
on 2a6b09b, and every file:line in the Owner Attribution additions was
read against it. Behavioral claims elsewhere in the file were not
re-audited.
* docs(specs): correct SECURE_COOKIES description to match current behavior
Third of the stale details RaresKeY enumerated. The cookie section
described SECURE_COOKIES as purely opt-in, which stopped being true.
_secure_cookie() (routes/auth_routes.py:89) treats an explicit true or
false as authoritative and derives the Secure attribute from the
request otherwise, including when the variable is unset and when
docker-compose injects it present-but-empty. Either the connection
scheme or the first X-Forwarded-Proto hop being https is enough.
* docs(specs): refresh current dev truth
---------
Co-authored-by: StressTestor <212606152+StressTestor@users.noreply.github.com>
1.8 KiB
llama.cpp Provider Shape
Last updated: dev@e57f60b | 2026-07-20
Scope
Canonical provider ID llamacpp; OpenAI Chat/Responses and Anthropic Messages
compatibility plus native server metadata; reader
src/model_capability_readers/llamacpp.py.
Metadata Shapes
/v1/models provides served identity and can include server model entries;
native /props is authoritative for the running model/server combination:
model_alias/model_path;default_generation_settings.n_ctxand samplingparams;total_slotsand optional/slots[].n_ctxfallback;chat_template_capsfor tools/system role;modalities.vision|audio;- current server/build state.
Capability depends on weights, projection/model assets, chat template, parser,
and launch flags. It is endpoint evidence, not a checkpoint-name claim.
/props and /v1/models can be merged only for the same served identity.
Request And Response Shape
llama-server supports several OpenAI-compatible tasks and native extensions. Do not infer embeddings/rerank/chat solely from the OpenAI model card; use an explicit server model capability field or endpoint configuration. Tool and reasoning correctness can depend on selected chat template and parser.
Fallback And Safety
The registry selects llama.cpp through an explicit vendor or endpoint kind; it
does not auto-detect /props from payload shape. Port 8000 currently maps to
the vLLM placeholder, while 8080 falls through to generic OpenAI-compatible.
llama.cpp-only session_id and cache_prompt affinity fields must remain local
endpoint behavior and never leak to strict cloud providers (#4640 and current
affinity tests).
Current Gaps
- Multi-model routing requires per-served-model
/propsassociation. - Parser/template configuration is not yet fully represented in canonical endpoint metadata.