Files
RaresKeYandStressTestor 7026cf40b5 docs: bootstrap specs ground truth (#5794)
* docs(specs): restore bootstrap after dev rewrite

* docs(specs): remove runtime inventory snapshot

* docs(specs): reconcile current dev truth

* docs(specs): document scheduled task actions as an owner-attribution source

Owner Attribution covered cookie, bearer-token and internal-loopback
requests. Scheduled task actions are a fourth source and behave
differently: _execute_action passes owner=task.owner off the stored
ScheduledTask row, so no request and no resolved principal are in
flight, and route-level require_user() never runs.

Webhook triggers are the sharp case. They are unauthenticated by
design with the token as the only credential and execute under the
stored task.owner.

Paths cite routes/task/task_routes.py, the canonical location after
the task subpackage move (#6081); routes/task_routes.py on current dev
is the backward-compat shim.

* docs(specs): add chained tasks to the trigger list, refresh dev stamp

Review feedback from RaresKeY on the previous commit.

"Every trigger path" was too broad: success-chained tasks are another
path into _execute_action. Added them with their own citation, and
noted that chaining additionally requires the target task to share
task.owner and rejects cycles, which is stricter than the trigger-side
checks. Softened the lead-in to "these trigger paths".

Line 56 still pointed at routes/task_routes.py for webhook credential
validation. That path is the backward-compat shim on current dev after
the task subpackage move (#6081); repointed to the canonical
routes/task/task_routes.py.

Stamp moved to dev@2a6b09b. Inspection backing that bump was scoped:
every file path cited in this spec was mechanically checked to resolve
on 2a6b09b, and every file:line in the Owner Attribution additions was
read against it. Behavioral claims elsewhere in the file were not
re-audited.

* docs(specs): correct SECURE_COOKIES description to match current behavior

Third of the stale details RaresKeY enumerated. The cookie section
described SECURE_COOKIES as purely opt-in, which stopped being true.

_secure_cookie() (routes/auth_routes.py:89) treats an explicit true or
false as authoritative and derives the Secure attribute from the
request otherwise, including when the variable is unset and when
docker-compose injects it present-but-empty. Either the connection
scheme or the first X-Forwarded-Proto hop being https is enough.

* docs(specs): refresh current dev truth

---------

Co-authored-by: StressTestor <212606152+StressTestor@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-08-25 14:18:44 +02:00

2.1 KiB

Anthropic Provider Shape

Last updated: dev@e71f8ce | 2026-08-25

Scope

Canonical placeholder vendor ID anthropic; Anthropic Messages runtime adapter in src/llm_core.py. There is no dedicated Anthropic capability-reader module; explicit/auto-detected Anthropic payloads use the generic identity-only reader.

Catalog Shape

GET /v1/models returns data[] model resources with id, type: model, display_name, and created_at, plus pagination metadata. These fields prove identity/availability only. Do not assume all listed Claude models share vision, tools, reasoning, sampling, or context limits.

Request And Response Shape

Native Messages uses a top-level system, alternating messages, content blocks, tools[].input_schema, tool_use assistant blocks, and tool_result user blocks. Text, thinking, signatures, server-tool blocks, and tool calls are typed content rather than OpenAI roles/fields. Preserve block IDs/signatures needed for continuation.

Sampling and thinking support can be version/model specific. The Opus 4.7+ sampling omission is a model-scoped runtime observation, not an Anthropic-wide rule. Runtime version parsing accepts explicit major/minor IDs and later major-only IDs such as claude-opus-5, treats a missing minor as .0, caps both components so date stamps cannot be misread as versions, and keeps legacy Claude 3 Opus sampling intact. Anthropic-compatible proxies are Anthropic dialect only when configured or their exact payload/endpoint shape proves it (#3110).

Fallback And Safety

Runtime and canonical reader detection use label-bounded Anthropic host matching or an explicit endpoint kind. A provider using Anthropic Messages through another host must be explicit. Identity-only model cards remain unknown.

Current Gaps

  • The public model list does not provide per-model canonical capability data.
  • There is no dedicated Anthropic canonical reader; only id, name, or model identity survives generic normalization.
  • Runtime model-version parsing needs structured identity before a later consumer can centralize sampling exceptions without another name matcher.