mirror of
https://github.com/pewdiepie-archdaemon/odysseus.git
synced 2026-11-09 14:42:21 +01:00
docs(maintainers): define the feature proposal workflow (#7000)
The handbook says substantial features need Product Owner approval before implementation, but not how a proposal gets there, what counts as substantial, or what happens when no answer comes. Add the full workflow: triage within 7 days, a decision brief, four product labels, a lazy-consensus timeout that only applies to big-but-reversible work, and definitions for every judgement call (small, big, reversible, new direction, fits ROADMAP, objection, recorded decision). The Feature Request form gets three optional fields for the brief, and the PR template, CONTRIBUTING and triage point at the workflow.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -9,6 +9,7 @@ This handbook records the project's maintainer governance and gives reviewers a
|
||||
| Area | Working rule |
|
||||
|---|---|
|
||||
| Product direction | Pewds is the Product Owner |
|
||||
| New feature | Feature Request issue; big, new-direction or hard-to-undo features need a recorded Product Owner decision ([workflow](product-and-features.md#feature-proposal-workflow)) |
|
||||
| Ordinary, reversible maintainer PR | Self-merge allowed after appropriate validation and applicable repository checks |
|
||||
| External contribution | Maintainer review required |
|
||||
| High-risk change | At least one **independent, qualified** maintainer review |
|
||||
@@ -22,7 +23,7 @@ These are governance rules, not guarantees that a GitHub permission or branch-pr
|
||||
## Start here
|
||||
|
||||
- [Roles and access](roles-and-access.md): responsibility, permissions, and continuity.
|
||||
- [Product and feature proposals](product-and-features.md): product approval versus technical ownership.
|
||||
- [Product and feature proposals](product-and-features.md): product approval versus technical ownership, and the feature proposal workflow.
|
||||
- [Changes and review](changes-and-review.md): review thresholds, self-merge, contributor corrections.
|
||||
- [Practical review playbook](review-playbook.md): risk, provenance, CI, CodeQL, independent audit, and handoff evidence.
|
||||
- [Triage](triage.md): turning incoming reports into actionable work.
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user