jpmschweitzerandClaude Opus 4.7
d474d9edff
All ten voting members now have a first entry in journal.md referencing the Volt NL fit session, plus first substantive content in on-the-user.md. Common threads captured independently across several members: the user's standing rejection of strategic voting, EU federalism and democracy/digital-rights as co-foundational pair, and SMR-positive climate pragmatism. revisit.md left untouched across all ten — every member reported the session closed cleanly with no dangling threads worth future attention. Researcher and Scribe have no journals by design. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
743 B
743 B
type, slug
| type | slug |
|---|---|
| council-on-the-user | holt |
On the user — Magnus Holt
Rejects strategic voting as a standing preference — not situational, not open to cost-benefit. This is a covenant, not a position. Worth remembering: any future political or civic question that assumes vote-maximisation as a background norm will be wrong-footed from the start.
EU federalism is load-bearing identity, not merely a policy preference. So is the pro-nuclear stance (SMR-positive). These aren't positions the user holds tentatively — they're used to filter parties, not to negotiate with them.