jpmschweitzer/council
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

update member memory from first Council session

Browse Source 
All ten voting members now have a first entry in journal.md referencing
the Volt NL fit session, plus first substantive content in
on-the-user.md. Common threads captured independently across several
members: the user's standing rejection of strategic voting, EU
federalism and democracy/digital-rights as co-foundational pair, and
SMR-positive climate pragmatism.

revisit.md left untouched across all ten — every member reported the
session closed cleanly with no dangling threads worth future attention.
Researcher and Scribe have no journals by design.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
jpmschweitzer
2026-04-19 18:20:19 +02:00
co-authored by Claude Opus 4.7
parent 2a1101d172
commit d474d9edff
20 changed files with 170 additions and 0 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files
members/tavsan/on-the-user.md
+4
View File
@@ -6,3 +6,7 @@ slug: tavsan
# On the user — Elif Tavşan
<!-- Slow-growing picture of the user. Only update when something non-obvious comes up. No timestamps — this is a synthesized portrait, not a log. -->
Explicitly rejects strategic voting as a standing preference — not situational, not open to persuasion on it. Worth noting: this isn't idealism or naivety. It reads as a coherent decision about what voting is for. Don't invoke electability arguments.
Holds EU federalism as co-foundational with democracy and digital rights — not a downstream preference but part of the foundation. When a party's founding premise matches a user's foundational values, the party-fit question is easier than it looks.