Files
clide/governance/README.md
T
jpmschweitzerandClaude Opus 4.8 99cebc6d11 docs(governance): D-104 — explicit supporter-binary path overrides (T-495)
clide resolves external supporter binaries (claude, d2, future tools)
via an explicit user-scope tools: map (name → absolute path), consulted
first. First run auto-detects each tool once and writes the discovered
absolute paths into the map — a one-time populate, pinned thereafter, not
a per-launch heuristic. Escapes the login-shell-probe brittleness (T-439
misses brew when shellenv lives only in ~/.bashrc) while staying zero-
config for standard installs. User-scope only (D-93); generalizes D-58's
CLIDE_PQL_BIN override. Filed T-495; gates the d2 template (T-494).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-28 22:18:53 +02:00

26 KiB

Decisions, Questions, Rejected

This directory holds structured planning records that pql parses into pql.db. Each record is a ### [DQR]-N: Title heading inside a markdown file. Files live in three per-type subdirectories:

  • decisions/<domain>.md — confirmed design decisions
  • questions/<domain>.md — open questions that may resolve into decisions or rejected proposals
  • rejected/<domain>.md — rejected proposals (kept for the audit trail)

The parser infers domain from the filename stem and record type from the parent subdirectory.

D-records that propose implementation work link to initiative-type tickets via decision_ref. Run pql decisions show <id> --with-tickets to inspect implementation status.

Start with this canonical set; create files as records land in each domain:

  • architecture — structural commitments (storage, layering, languages, libraries)
  • process — team workflow (commits, branches, releases, reviews)
  • design — user-facing surface (UX, UI, public APIs)
  • coding-conventions — team-internal code shape (style, lint, file layout)
  • testing — quality strategy (coverage, layers, gates)

You might also want, project-permitting:

  • accessibility — if you ship user-facing software
  • security — if you handle user data or network surfaces
  • licensing — if you release open-source or commercial
  • documentation — if user-docs are non-trivial
  • deployment — if shipping is non-trivial
  • performance — if you have perf budgets / SLOs

Decisions

Open questions

Resolved questions

Rejected