Files
clide/governance
jpmschweitzerandClaude Opus 4.8 da61af810d decide D-87 (output/log dock) + resolve Q-28; file T-258 (terminal home)
D-87 — T-54's "output and log panel" is a bottom output dock: read-only,
two tabs (Output = the Logger stream, filterable + auto-scroll; Problems =
diagnostics moved out of the sidebar). Toggled by a single status-bar widget
that replaces the app-status indicator (merged health+log: green check when
clean, warn/error counts otherwise) via click or Cmd/Ctrl+J. Needs a bounded
ring sink on the Logger (no history today). Amends D-47: the dock is the one
surface allowed to push Claude up, capped so Claude stays >=50%.

Resolves Q-28 by splitting on interaction: read-only output (logs/problems)
goes in the dock; the terminal does NOT — it stays a first-class editor-pane
surface, tracked by new T-258 (swap-vs-split, with Q-27). Refines T-54.

Wireframe under docs/design/wireframes/output-dock/.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-06 22:57:18 +02:00
..

Decisions, Questions, Rejected

This directory holds structured planning records that pql parses into pql.db. Each record is a ### [DQR]-N: Title heading inside a markdown file. Files live in three per-type subdirectories:

  • decisions/<domain>.md — confirmed design decisions
  • questions/<domain>.md — open questions that may resolve into decisions or rejected proposals
  • rejected/<domain>.md — rejected proposals (kept for the audit trail)

The parser infers domain from the filename stem and record type from the parent subdirectory.

D-records that propose implementation work link to initiative-type tickets via decision_ref. Run pql decisions show <id> --with-tickets to inspect implementation status.

Start with this canonical set; create files as records land in each domain:

  • architecture — structural commitments (storage, layering, languages, libraries)
  • process — team workflow (commits, branches, releases, reviews)
  • design — user-facing surface (UX, UI, public APIs)
  • coding-conventions — team-internal code shape (style, lint, file layout)
  • testing — quality strategy (coverage, layers, gates)

You might also want, project-permitting:

  • accessibility — if you ship user-facing software
  • security — if you handle user data or network surfaces
  • licensing — if you release open-source or commercial
  • documentation — if user-docs are non-trivial
  • deployment — if shipping is non-trivial
  • performance — if you have perf budgets / SLOs

Decisions

Open questions

Resolved questions

Rejected