Files
clide/governance
jpmschweitzerandClaude c4bccd35a3 T-124: unix-domain IPC server, wired into Flutter app boot
First slice of T-99 (the D-56-path-a IPC server). What this lands:

* lib/src/ipc/paths.dart rewritten — `workspaceSocketPath(root)`
  returns the per-workspace path per D-70 (FNV-1a 64-bit hash, hex,
  no crypto dep — D-70 amended in this commit to record the hash
  choice). Old `defaultSocketPath()` removed; the lone fallback in
  facade.dart kept with a clear placeholder pending T-127.
* lib/src/ipc/server.dart — IpcServer class. ServerSocket.listen
  accept loop (D-72), 0600 socket + 0700 parent (D-71), stale-node
  probe + unlink on start, refuses to clobber a live listener.
* lib/main.dart — IpcServer started after the first dispatcher is
  built and swapped on project open (workspace path changes).
  Failure logged but non-fatal so the UI still works without IPC.
* 11 server tests + 5 path tests cover socket modes, multi-conn,
  stale unlink, live-conflict, idempotent start/stop.

T-99 children downstream of T-124 (T-125 / T-126 / T-127 / T-130)
are now unblocked.

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-05-18 14:51:35 +02:00
..

Decisions, Questions, Rejected

This directory holds structured planning records that pql parses into pql.db. Each record is a ### [DQR]-N: Title heading inside a markdown file. Files live in three per-type subdirectories:

  • decisions/<domain>.md — confirmed design decisions
  • questions/<domain>.md — open questions that may resolve into decisions or rejected proposals
  • rejected/<domain>.md — rejected proposals (kept for the audit trail)

The parser infers domain from the filename stem and record type from the parent subdirectory.

D-records that propose implementation work link to initiative-type tickets via decision_ref. Run pql decisions show <id> --with-tickets to inspect implementation status.

Start with this canonical set; create files as records land in each domain:

  • architecture — structural commitments (storage, layering, languages, libraries)
  • process — team workflow (commits, branches, releases, reviews)
  • design — user-facing surface (UX, UI, public APIs)
  • coding-conventions — team-internal code shape (style, lint, file layout)
  • testing — quality strategy (coverage, layers, gates)

You might also want, project-permitting:

  • accessibility — if you ship user-facing software
  • security — if you handle user data or network surfaces
  • licensing — if you release open-source or commercial
  • documentation — if user-docs are non-trivial
  • deployment — if shipping is non-trivial
  • performance — if you have perf budgets / SLOs

Decisions

Open questions

Rejected