Files
clide/governance/README.md
T
jpmschweitzerandClaude Opus 4.8 501018ddc9 decide the dogfood agent model (D-83)
Records D-83 answering Gap 5 of docs/self-analysis.md: clide commits to
both "Claude inside clide" models, with the clide-HOSTED stream-json
session (D-77/D-78) as the PRIMARY dogfood target — the process clide
spawns, hence the one Epic B (T-214) bootstraps (CLIDE_SOCK/CLIDE_WORKSPACE
+ PATH + context note + Bash(clide *) allow rule). The EXTERNAL CLI driver
(D-68) stays a first-class but SECONDARY, best-effort integration: manual
install (T-212), no promise to observe its non-clide tool use.

Scopes the D-6 parity contract (Epic C / T-218) to clide's own surfaces
reflected through the CLI in both directions; an external agent's
side-channel reads/tests/git are explicitly out of parity scope.

Closes T-224 (under T-208 "Give Claude hands").

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-03 11:08:20 +02:00

20 KiB

Decisions, Questions, Rejected

This directory holds structured planning records that pql parses into pql.db. Each record is a ### [DQR]-N: Title heading inside a markdown file. Files live in three per-type subdirectories:

  • decisions/<domain>.md — confirmed design decisions
  • questions/<domain>.md — open questions that may resolve into decisions or rejected proposals
  • rejected/<domain>.md — rejected proposals (kept for the audit trail)

The parser infers domain from the filename stem and record type from the parent subdirectory.

D-records that propose implementation work link to initiative-type tickets via decision_ref. Run pql decisions show <id> --with-tickets to inspect implementation status.

Start with this canonical set; create files as records land in each domain:

  • architecture — structural commitments (storage, layering, languages, libraries)
  • process — team workflow (commits, branches, releases, reviews)
  • design — user-facing surface (UX, UI, public APIs)
  • coding-conventions — team-internal code shape (style, lint, file layout)
  • testing — quality strategy (coverage, layers, gates)

You might also want, project-permitting:

  • accessibility — if you ship user-facing software
  • security — if you handle user data or network surfaces
  • licensing — if you release open-source or commercial
  • documentation — if user-docs are non-trivial
  • deployment — if shipping is non-trivial
  • performance — if you have perf budgets / SLOs

Decisions

Open questions

Resolved questions

Rejected