Files
clide/governance
jpmschweitzerandClaude Opus 4.8 bb0d78f8de Q-51 + T-422 epic: unify workspace lifecycle on one fenced primitive
The status-bar branch bleed (T-421) is a symptom of a deeper gap: there
is no single "open workspace X" primitive — only project.open() (in-place,
same process, shared daemonBus) and newWindow() (blank detached process,
no repo arg, no env scrub). T-367 and T-269 are the same root.

- Q-51 (architecture): unify on WorkspaceService.open(root, target);
  open question of whether in-place switching survives at all vs a
  strict workspace⇒window⇒process⇒socket⇒bus⇒session-id 1:1 mapping.
- T-422 epic owns the unification; T-421 reparented under it; T-423
  builds the primitive and routes all entry points through it.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-14 17:47:33 +02:00
..

Decisions, Questions, Rejected

This directory holds structured planning records that pql parses into pql.db. Each record is a ### [DQR]-N: Title heading inside a markdown file. Files live in three per-type subdirectories:

  • decisions/<domain>.md — confirmed design decisions
  • questions/<domain>.md — open questions that may resolve into decisions or rejected proposals
  • rejected/<domain>.md — rejected proposals (kept for the audit trail)

The parser infers domain from the filename stem and record type from the parent subdirectory.

D-records that propose implementation work link to initiative-type tickets via decision_ref. Run pql decisions show <id> --with-tickets to inspect implementation status.

Start with this canonical set; create files as records land in each domain:

  • architecture — structural commitments (storage, layering, languages, libraries)
  • process — team workflow (commits, branches, releases, reviews)
  • design — user-facing surface (UX, UI, public APIs)
  • coding-conventions — team-internal code shape (style, lint, file layout)
  • testing — quality strategy (coverage, layers, gates)

You might also want, project-permitting:

  • accessibility — if you ship user-facing software
  • security — if you handle user data or network surfaces
  • licensing — if you release open-source or commercial
  • documentation — if user-docs are non-trivial
  • deployment — if shipping is non-trivial
  • performance — if you have perf budgets / SLOs

Decisions

Open questions

Resolved questions

Rejected