Files
clide/governance/README.md
T
jpmschweitzerandClaude Fable 5 647c22d32a file Q-35 through Q-49 for the Fable review feature proposals
New governance/questions/design.md holds one open question per Part IV
feature proposal — Tier 1 (agent blame, context x-ray, trust ledger,
activity HUD, active-ticket chip), Tier 2 (twin-timeline rewind, visual
dialog, immortal terminals, cost ledger, ticket dispatch), Tier 3
(semantic terminal, codebase map, live mixed documents, sealed
workspace) — plus one batch record for the honorable mentions, so each
can resolve into a D-record + initiative or an R-record. Remote Claude
over SSH got a context append on existing Q-23 instead of a duplicate
record. README index regenerated by pql decisions sync.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-12 00:14:21 +02:00

24 KiB

Decisions, Questions, Rejected

This directory holds structured planning records that pql parses into pql.db. Each record is a ### [DQR]-N: Title heading inside a markdown file. Files live in three per-type subdirectories:

  • decisions/<domain>.md — confirmed design decisions
  • questions/<domain>.md — open questions that may resolve into decisions or rejected proposals
  • rejected/<domain>.md — rejected proposals (kept for the audit trail)

The parser infers domain from the filename stem and record type from the parent subdirectory.

D-records that propose implementation work link to initiative-type tickets via decision_ref. Run pql decisions show <id> --with-tickets to inspect implementation status.

Start with this canonical set; create files as records land in each domain:

  • architecture — structural commitments (storage, layering, languages, libraries)
  • process — team workflow (commits, branches, releases, reviews)
  • design — user-facing surface (UX, UI, public APIs)
  • coding-conventions — team-internal code shape (style, lint, file layout)
  • testing — quality strategy (coverage, layers, gates)

You might also want, project-permitting:

  • accessibility — if you ship user-facing software
  • security — if you handle user data or network surfaces
  • licensing — if you release open-source or commercial
  • documentation — if user-docs are non-trivial
  • deployment — if shipping is non-trivial
  • performance — if you have perf budgets / SLOs

Decisions

Open questions

Resolved questions

Rejected