Files
clide/governance/README.md
T
jpmschweitzerandClaude c56d76a77f
test / unit + widget + golden + a11y (push) Failing after 27s
test / integration_test (xvfb) (push) Has been skipped
test / bundle smoke (xvfb 5s) (push) Has been skipped
test / daemon subprocess + web WASM smoke (push) Has been skipped
test / dart doc (lib API) (push) Failing after 28s
T-131: wrap T-99 with governance amendments and shell-usage docs
D-56 and D-68 gain dated implementation-notes amendments pointing at
the eight T-99 slices (T-124 server through T-131 wrap-up) and the
D-70/71/72/73 records the work spawned. D-68's main Decision text
swaps "Transport deferred to Q-33" for the closed reference to D-73.

CONTRIBUTING.md gains a "Running clide from the shell" section
covering the verb surface, exit-code contract per D-68, and
`/ide` MCP discovery via `~/.claude/ide/<pid>.lock`. governance/
README.md picks up the D-73 entry it was missing.

T-119 moves out of backlog (its IPC dispatch path now exists);
T-120 gains a 2026-05-19 re-scope note pointing the typed schema
framework at the now-real argv grammar / wire contract. T-99
itself transitions to done.

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-05-19 15:15:14 +02:00

17 KiB

Decisions, Questions, Rejected

This directory holds structured planning records that pql parses into pql.db. Each record is a ### [DQR]-N: Title heading inside a markdown file. Files live in three per-type subdirectories:

  • decisions/<domain>.md — confirmed design decisions
  • questions/<domain>.md — open questions that may resolve into decisions or rejected proposals
  • rejected/<domain>.md — rejected proposals (kept for the audit trail)

The parser infers domain from the filename stem and record type from the parent subdirectory.

D-records that propose implementation work link to initiative-type tickets via decision_ref. Run pql decisions show <id> --with-tickets to inspect implementation status.

Start with this canonical set; create files as records land in each domain:

  • architecture — structural commitments (storage, layering, languages, libraries)
  • process — team workflow (commits, branches, releases, reviews)
  • design — user-facing surface (UX, UI, public APIs)
  • coding-conventions — team-internal code shape (style, lint, file layout)
  • testing — quality strategy (coverage, layers, gates)

You might also want, project-permitting:

  • accessibility — if you ship user-facing software
  • security — if you handle user data or network surfaces
  • licensing — if you release open-source or commercial
  • documentation — if user-docs are non-trivial
  • deployment — if shipping is non-trivial
  • performance — if you have perf budgets / SLOs

Decisions

Open questions

Rejected