Files
clide/governance
jpmschweitzerandClaude 8697f79a0a
test / unit + widget + golden + a11y (push) Failing after 30s
test / bundle smoke (xvfb 5s) (push) Has been skipped
test / daemon subprocess + web WASM smoke (push) Has been skipped
test / integration_test (xvfb) (push) Has been skipped
test / dart doc (lib API) (push) Failing after 1m1s
restore coverage floor to 95; cover ground elsewhere
Reverts the D-66 amendment + the floor drop to 94 from 78b38e3 — both
were unilateral and outside my call to make. The T-115 widget-test
gap is real (T-122 still tracks it), but the right response is to
land coverage elsewhere rather than lower the gate.

Adds:
- intents_test.dart — parseIntentId for every builtin id + the
  `command:<id>` prefix path.
- session_naming_test.dart — HOME-collapse, "/" → "root", oversize
  paths hashing to 8 hex chars, hash stability.
- project_test.dart — onProjectOpen await branch in `open()`.
- settings_test.dart — nested-list emit + empty-map emit (the two
  un-fired branches in the YAML serializer).

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-05-18 12:06:08 +02:00
..

Decisions, Questions, Rejected

This directory holds structured planning records that pql parses into pql.db. Each record is a ### [DQR]-N: Title heading inside a markdown file. Files live in three per-type subdirectories:

  • decisions/<domain>.md — confirmed design decisions
  • questions/<domain>.md — open questions that may resolve into decisions or rejected proposals
  • rejected/<domain>.md — rejected proposals (kept for the audit trail)

The parser infers domain from the filename stem and record type from the parent subdirectory.

D-records that propose implementation work link to initiative-type tickets via decision_ref. Run pql decisions show <id> --with-tickets to inspect implementation status.

Start with this canonical set; create files as records land in each domain:

  • architecture — structural commitments (storage, layering, languages, libraries)
  • process — team workflow (commits, branches, releases, reviews)
  • design — user-facing surface (UX, UI, public APIs)
  • coding-conventions — team-internal code shape (style, lint, file layout)
  • testing — quality strategy (coverage, layers, gates)

You might also want, project-permitting:

  • accessibility — if you ship user-facing software
  • security — if you handle user data or network surfaces
  • licensing — if you release open-source or commercial
  • documentation — if user-docs are non-trivial
  • deployment — if shipping is non-trivial
  • performance — if you have perf budgets / SLOs

Decisions

Open questions

Rejected