Files
clide/governance
jpmschweitzerandClaude Opus 4.8 0bb89a2e58 read user-scope Claude config files via a read allow-list (D-80)
The reader opened repo-local .claude markdown but rejected user-scope
files under ~/.claude with "path outside workspace" — that dir is
global, outside the repo, and files.read was repo-confined (T-102).

Per D-76 the Claude config surface is clide-managed, so files.read now
resolves a path under an allow-list: the workspace root plus trusted
extra read roots (FilesService.extraReadRoots), wired in main.dart to
~/.claude when present. Reads widen; writes stay repo-confined, and the
symlink re-check still refuses a config-root symlink that escapes. Off-
root paths and `..` traversal are rejected as before.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-01 09:08:32 +02:00
..

Decisions, Questions, Rejected

This directory holds structured planning records that pql parses into pql.db. Each record is a ### [DQR]-N: Title heading inside a markdown file. Files live in three per-type subdirectories:

  • decisions/<domain>.md — confirmed design decisions
  • questions/<domain>.md — open questions that may resolve into decisions or rejected proposals
  • rejected/<domain>.md — rejected proposals (kept for the audit trail)

The parser infers domain from the filename stem and record type from the parent subdirectory.

D-records that propose implementation work link to initiative-type tickets via decision_ref. Run pql decisions show <id> --with-tickets to inspect implementation status.

Start with this canonical set; create files as records land in each domain:

  • architecture — structural commitments (storage, layering, languages, libraries)
  • process — team workflow (commits, branches, releases, reviews)
  • design — user-facing surface (UX, UI, public APIs)
  • coding-conventions — team-internal code shape (style, lint, file layout)
  • testing — quality strategy (coverage, layers, gates)

You might also want, project-permitting:

  • accessibility — if you ship user-facing software
  • security — if you handle user data or network surfaces
  • licensing — if you release open-source or commercial
  • documentation — if user-docs are non-trivial
  • deployment — if shipping is non-trivial
  • performance — if you have perf budgets / SLOs

Decisions

Open questions

Resolved questions

Rejected